No, as long as the officials don't take an age looking from 15 different angles. If it is not obvious then let it ride. Keep it snappy and it will improve the game. In addition, there was a game at the end of the season in England, can't remember what it is was, where the ref handled it brilliantly. He spoke to the players, joked with them, told them to stop shouting at him over decisions and let the VAR people do their job. By the end the players were calmer, decisions were made correctly, the game moved on. The announcing of VAR decisions on screens at the game will also help. They need to keep fans informed and the previous quiet was a problem.
This is exactly what I mean about it being over-used. They have so far forgotten the 'clear and obvious error' part of their own definition on when it's used. If someone's a clear foot offside and it's been missed, then it should be overruled, if there's a centremetre in it then that's level in my book. If the naked eye would call it level then it should be left alone.
10 secs is too short a time but I would say that if you can't figure it out after 45 secs max, that figure could be shortened further, then the original decision stands.
But with the niggly fouls and the time taken for free kicks corners and throw ins these days is there really a flow to the game anyway.
We still have Salah and Mane though.
That is why I said it could be shortened further. Don't forget the start of the process is happening in a building miles from the ground. Whilst the players are surrounding the ref, player getting treatment etc the VAR people are already looking at the incident. Equally, the incident may be being looked at whilst the game is going on. It is a work in progress but it can get better.
