Not knowing the very basics of rules in comps.

Am I misunderstanding you here? No need to talk to 'PPs' when identifying a ball. Just mark it before, don't clean it & replace/lift marker
Literally going to a ball in the rough and picking it up to see if it is theirs. No marking, no explanation that they need to identify the ball. Simply get there and lift it up.
 
Literally going to a ball in the rough and picking it up to see if it is theirs. No marking, no explanation that they need to identify the ball. Simply get there and lift it up.

Well yeah, that's a bit diff.
Picking up a ball to ID it without marking it is wrong (whether you have a "word with PPs" or not) But there's still no explanation needed to those other players
 
Addressing the ball and in the backswing?

It is also good etiquette to inform a PP of your intent to move a ball
Don't bring the etiquette v rules thing up. Previous threads have got very vocal (raking bunkers before playing, announcing type of ball on tee, etc) because some people think it is a good idea to do things a certain way. This is where a lot of the false rules come from.
 
Don't bring the etiquette v rules thing up. Previous threads have got very vocal (raking bunkers before playing, announcing type of ball on tee, etc) because some people think it is a good idea to do things a certain way. This is where a lot of the false rules come from.
But if you intend to move a ball, I was told from a very young age it is good etiquette to inform a PP so there can be no mis-understanding. It seems logical to me
 
Addressing the ball and in the backswing?

It is also good etiquette to inform a PP of your intent to move a ball

Its not good etiquette though

Talking to them might be seen as an additional safeguard. Say if you think the conditions suggest it'd be all too easy to inadvertently improve the lie when replacing etc then I might shout over etc
 
Its not good etiquette though

Talking to them might be seen as an additional safeguard. Say if you think the conditions suggest it'd be all too easy to inadvertently improve the lie when replacing etc then I might shout over etc
If we are going to drill into the detail then I would announce my intent and be quite happy for the PP to come over and watch as I moved it to identify and replace as it lied. My original point is about those simply marching up in a competition and without any warning picking it up to identify and the putting back. Where that was as it lay I would suggest would be open to conjecture.
 
Does anyone really think that in the current climate a club can afford to turn away a years membership fee because they scored 80% not 85% on a rules test? Also, backing up @HomerJSimpson point. What if existing members fail? Do you kick them out? Golf clubs don't have that luxury on the whole.
I figured it would just be for eligibility to win board comps, rather than to be a member at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: D-S
I figured it would just be for eligibility to win board comps, rather than to be a member at all.
I would like to see it for all comps given what I've seen and some of the stories I've heard in the 19th (of course how much embellishment there has been is ope to debate). As our members need a minimum of 6 comp cards to be eligible for a board event in the last rolling 12 months you would hope people that have inadvertantly digressed have been made aware and learned from it.
 
If we are going to drill into the detail then I would announce my intent and be quite happy for the PP to come over and watch as I moved it to identify and replace as it lied. My original point is about those simply marching up in a competition and without any warning picking it up to identify and the putting back. Where that was as it lay I would suggest would be open to conjecture.

The detail, funny you'd mention that.
You didn’t mention anything about them having a basic military gait in your earlier post, that changes everything. Well, no it obviously doesn’t really but your scenario keeps changing from original its hard to keep up


Look all I was doing was trying to clarify your point “picking up a ball to identify without a word to any PP's”
That was all the info I had to go on until you then added the bit about 'not marking it' while continuing to 'not offer explanations to PPs' and about it being 'good etiquette' to do so (so 1 out of 3 are 'rules' correct)

Not sure where your suggestion re conjecture comes into the rule
 
If we are going to drill into the detail then I would announce my intent and be quite happy for the PP to come over and watch as I moved it to identify and replace as it lied. My original point is about those simply marching up in a competition and without any warning picking it up to identify and the putting back. Where that was as it lay I would suggest would be open to conjecture.
If a ball needs lifting that much to identify it I would hazard a guess that it is very likely to be unplayable.
I can identify my ball by lifting it no more than a couple of mm to be able to rotate it in my fingers to see my mark.It then goes back down exactly where it was.
 
If a ball needs lifting that much to identify it I would hazard a guess that it is very likely to be unplayable.
I can identify my ball by lifting it no more than a couple of mm to be able to rotate it in my fingers to see my mark.It then goes back down exactly where it was.
And in most cases I would agree although in muddier conditions perhaps not but ultimately we are probably nit picking here. It is still a world of difference to walking up to a ball and simply picking it up
 
I figured it would just be for eligibility to win board comps, rather than to be a member at all.

If players are required to have some sort of exam before being allowed to win then it’s just adding a barrier that’s not really required

And how often would people be required to do it ?

Already seen a few incorrect rules on here being highlighted - is it a yearly refresher whenever rules change ? Every time someone changes clubs etc

Is it like having a HC certificate- you will also need to have a Rules certificate as well as having a certain amount cards etc.
 
If a ball needs lifting that much to identify it I would hazard a guess that it is very likely to be unplayable.
I can identify my ball by lifting it no more than a couple of mm to be able to rotate it in my fingers to see my mark.It then goes back down exactly where it was.
Presumably you mark the ball before lifting a couple of mm?
 
If you take it please tell us what you thought of it and whether getting players to do it would be a good idea or not.
OK, I have just taken it without bothering to do any of the preliminary stuff. Passed (phew!) with 88%.

The biggest irritation I had with the test was that after it told me which questions I got wrong, there was no way to go back and review those questions, nor was there any explanation why my answer was wrong. It looked as if the big red X was a link of some sort (cursor changed to the standard link icon), but when clicked (in the hope it would give me some more info about my incorrect answer) it did nothing.

Would it be a good idea to get players to take it?
In principle yes.
In practice, most wouldn't want to bother. So unless there was a reward for doing so (eg. you're not allowed to play in club comps without passing the exam), I can't see how it would help.
 
Top