Muirfield to vote again!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted Member 1156
  • Start date Start date
I see Rory's in the press virtue signalling about this. If you feel that strongly boycott the event. Oh wait, there's money to be earned by entering. Guess that means it's all ok then.
 
I see Rory's in the press virtue signalling about this. If you feel that strongly boycott the event. Oh wait, there's money to be earned by entering. Guess that means it's all ok then.

That'll be the same Rory that had a lot to say about golf in the Olympics. He needs to shut his mouth more and let his clubs do the talking.
 
That'll be the same Rory that had a lot to say about golf in the Olympics. He needs to shut his mouth more and let his clubs do the talking.

Yep. My exact thoughts. I think he's becoming too involved in stuff away from the course. Fantastic golfer but I've never really taken to him. There was no need for him to say anything about Muirfield now that common sense has prevailed.
 
Yep. My exact thoughts. I think he's becoming too involved in stuff away from the course. Fantastic golfer but I've never really taken to him. There was no need for him to say anything about Muirfield now that common sense has prevailed.

Easy to say but he was asked a question about it..
What's he supposed to do?
If he doesn't answer he gets accused of not caring or, worse still, supporting the old Muirfield stance.
He was asked a question and he answered it....
 
Can't see what it is exactly that Rory has said that is wrong , he was right about the Olympics and he is right about Muirfield - he is allowed to speak his mind when asked a question and shows he is human and not a media robot
 
I see Rory's in the press virtue signalling about this. If you feel that strongly boycott the event. Oh wait, there's money to be earned by entering. Guess that means it's all ok then.

The number of events Rory enters (or doesn't) shows where his priorities are. It's not money (anymore). His only aim is majors.

And lets be hinest, we all know they vote changed for one reason and one reason only. I'd like to the the place boycotted until a healthy female membership has been built up and not just a bit of tokenism.
 
I see Rory's in the press virtue signalling about this. If you feel that strongly boycott the event. Oh wait, there's money to be earned by entering. Guess that means it's all ok then.

I think k you'll find that he wouldnt boycott the event because its a major and he is a past champion of said major. Its nothing to do with money. Any other event other than the majors yeah you could maybe say that. But the players at the top of the game and the 3rd best golfer in the world don't care about money they want to put their names down in the history books. Rory has already said his sights are on Nick Faldo as Britain's best golfer, so if he has a chance to go to Muirfield and add to his 4 majors you can be sure that he'll be there.
 
The number of events Rory enters (or doesn't) shows where his priorities are. It's not money (anymore). His only aim is majors.

And lets be hinest, we all know they vote changed for one reason and one reason only. I'd like to the the place boycotted until a healthy female membership has been built up and not just a bit of tokenism.

Muirfield is the best course on the Open rota, why should the R&A boycott it? It meets the criteria that the R&A are looking for and they want their major played on the best links courses in the U.K.

It seems like the membership were always going to come out of this poorly regardless of the vote.
 
Muirfield is the best course on the Open rota, why should the R&A boycott it? It meets the criteria that the R&A are looking for and they want their major played on the best links courses in the U.K.

It seems like the membership were always going to come out of this poorly regardless of the vote.

Because the second vote was purely tokenism.

They had a chance with the first vote and left themselves with egg on their face. The standard of the course is irrelevant imo. They've had a second vote purely to get the open, nit to grow the game.

Well put them to the back of the list until the effects of the vote are clear to see.
 
Unfortunately, I don't think the game of golf has come out of this whole affair with much credibility at all.
I think most people realise the second vote was purely based on money rather than morality.
 
Because the second vote was purely tokenism.

They had a chance with the first vote and left themselves with egg on their face. The standard of the course is irrelevant imo. They've had a second vote purely to get the open, nit to grow the game.

Well put them to the back of the list until the effects of the vote are clear to see.

Call it tokenism or not, it happened and it's time to move on from it.

Muirfield doesn't need the Open and a high percentage of members would rather they didn't get it.
 
The number of events Rory enters (or doesn't) shows where his priorities are. It's not money (anymore). His only aim is majors.

And lets be hinest, we all know they vote changed for one reason and one reason only. I'd like to the the place boycotted until a healthy female membership has been built up and not just a bit of tokenism.

Money/prestige/more majors, whatever. He could have simply replied 'yeah, common sense prevails' but he enters into a diatribe saying 'obscene, 'horrendous'. If that's his stance boycott the next open and show them you firmly believe in what's happened. Doubt he will though.
 
A bit like Brexit/Trump if you let the members vote you cant be sure you'll get the result you want! Im pretty suretheir committee wanted it to go through first time
 
Muirfield doesn't need the Open and a high percentage of members would rather they didn't get it.

This is the correct answer! The HCEG do not need the money or inconvenience that The Open brings to Muirfield. Pressure has been put on them by the media to conform to public opinion and admit lady members. The town of Gullane and the surrounding area however do want the open to remain at Muirfield because of the revenue that The Open brings.
 
The number of events Rory enters (or doesn't) shows where his priorities are. It's not money (anymore). His only aim is majors.

And lets be hinest, we all know they vote changed for one reason and one reason only. I'd like to the the place boycotted until a healthy female membership has been built up and not just a bit of tokenism.


And what is that reason?
 
Call it tokenism or not, it happened and it's time to move on from it.

Muirfield doesn't need the Open and a high percentage of members would rather they didn't get it.

This is the correct answer! The HCEG do not need the money or inconvenience that The Open brings to Muirfield. Pressure has been put on them by the media to conform to public opinion and admit lady members. The town of Gullane and the surrounding area however do want the open to remain at Muirfield because of the revenue that The Open brings.

totally agree, just media pressure.

no doubt they will just do what the R&A have and just have a few token ladies anyway
 
Top