Beezerk
Money List Winner
Whatever the outcome it sounds like bad crack/planning from the start.
Just say the first tee time for your monthly medal is 07.30 and the last is at 4pm and each tee time is booked solid from start to finish, how long would the last groups take if the first group took 5 hours to play 18 holes?
Tee times would get delayed as the groups build up though so it would be even longer.
....
Edit**
This is by no means accurate, but if you assume a 4min delay after the first group on each par4 and 5 and a 6 min delay in teeing off on each par 3 and a generous 1 min walking time from green to tee box, then the last group could be looking at a 22:45hrs finish time.
The above was based on my course lay out to get the figures.
Your logic is flawed!
Would it be fair to say that generally a 5 hour 4 ball going out first could dictate the speed of play ALL DAY ?
However, there are so many variables That I think that 'darn pesky kid' Bob is just 'funnin' with us
I'm being very serious.
The point I was hoping to make was if the first group out are slow, it doesn't just affect a few groups behind, it would affect all groups.
Whether it be a 4 ball for 5 hours or a 3 ball for 4.30 hours doesn't really matter. The following groups would normally not have any problems keeping up but with nowhere to go, who's going to let who through? Nobody.
If however the first 4 ball nip round in 3.30 hours and the course slows up behind them then there would be 'room' to call groups through and a course marshall wouldn't have any problems identifying any slow groups/players as the gaps open up.
I'm being very serious.
The point I was hoping to make was if the first group out are slow, it doesn't just affect a few groups behind, it would affect all groups.
Whether it be a 4 ball for 5 hours or a 3 ball for 4.30 hours doesn't really matter. The following groups would normally not have any problems keeping up but with nowhere to go, who's going to let who through? Nobody.
If however the first 4 ball nip round in 3.30 hours and the course slows up behind them then there would be 'room' to call groups through and a course marshall wouldn't have any problems identifying any slow groups/players as the gaps open up.
I'm being very serious.
The point I was hoping to make was if the first group out are slow, it doesn't just affect a few groups behind, it would affect all groups.
Whether it be a 4 ball for 5 hours or a 3 ball for 4.30 hours doesn't really matter. The following groups would normally not have any problems keeping up but with nowhere to go, who's going to let who through? Nobody.
If however the first 4 ball nip round in 3.30 hours and the course slows up behind them then there would be 'room' to call groups through and a course marshall wouldn't have any problems identifying any slow groups/players as the gaps open up.
You are, in effect, adding the delays and time for distance between holes etc in twice.How so?Your logic is flawed!
I'm guessing this is not an entirely hypothetical situation?
If the first group out on an empty course really do take 5 hours to get round, they should be put at back of field for the next few months!
Your timing logic is also flawed. If the 'standard' for the course is 4 hours 30, say, and a quick group can get round in 3:30, then there is plenty of room in front of the slow 1st group for following groups to be let through - in fact 2 hours (approx 9 holes) worth of gap in front.
Who said anything about the first group letting anyone through?
However!
If the first group takes 5 hours but all other groups, when not held up, play at a pace that allows them round in 3.5 hours then all the groups who tee off after 12.30 when the first group finishes will get round in 3.5 hours. All groups still on the course will complete their round in times increasingly tending towards 3.5 hours depending what part of the course they were on when the slowpokes finished!
![]()
exactly- as in post 3