Monthly medal

Just say the first tee time for your monthly medal is 07.30 and the last is at 4pm and each tee time is booked solid from start to finish, how long would the last groups take if the first group took 5 hours to play 18 holes?

Depends if the first group took 5 hours because they let another group through on each and every hole?
 
Tee times would get delayed as the groups build up though so it would be even longer.

tee times delayed but when you start you could do it in the normal time -post#3 - once the 'caravan' at the front had gone.


However, there are so many variables That I think that 'darn pesky kid' Bob is just 'funnin' with us
 
....
Edit**

This is by no means accurate, but if you assume a 4min delay after the first group on each par4 and 5 and a 6 min delay in teeing off on each par 3 and a generous 1 min walking time from green to tee box, then the last group could be looking at a 22:45hrs finish time.

The above was based on my course lay out to get the figures.

Your logic is flawed!
 
Would it be fair to say that generally a 5 hour 4 ball going out first could dictate the speed of play ALL DAY ?

That could be possible if they were not to let other groups through as necessary , id say there would be a good few walk ins though , so that "might" speed it up a bit for the late starters

be some complaints tho id say
 
However, there are so many variables That I think that 'darn pesky kid' Bob is just 'funnin' with us

I'm being very serious.
The point I was hoping to make was if the first group out are slow, it doesn't just affect a few groups behind, it would affect all groups.
Whether it be a 4 ball for 5 hours or a 3 ball for 4.30 hours doesn't really matter. The following groups would normally not have any problems keeping up but with nowhere to go, who's going to let who through? Nobody.
If however the first 4 ball nip round in 3.30 hours and the course slows up behind them then there would be 'room' to call groups through and a course marshall wouldn't have any problems identifying any slow groups/players as the gaps open up.
 
If the 7:30 lot were coming in when I normally tee off around mid day then my round wouldn't even start as I would jump back in the car! In my experience anyone who books a tee time before 0900hrs does not want to be out on the course very long and defo not 5 hours, there would be blood spilled at my gaff!

Ps you you didn't factor in weather conditions, time of year, stint meter reading for the greens etc :swing:
 
I'm being very serious.
The point I was hoping to make was if the first group out are slow, it doesn't just affect a few groups behind, it would affect all groups.
Whether it be a 4 ball for 5 hours or a 3 ball for 4.30 hours doesn't really matter. The following groups would normally not have any problems keeping up but with nowhere to go, who's going to let who through? Nobody.
If however the first 4 ball nip round in 3.30 hours and the course slows up behind them then there would be 'room' to call groups through and a course marshall wouldn't have any problems identifying any slow groups/players as the gaps open up.

So in other words it is just as important to marshall the front of the queue as it is the back.

This has been a problem for me before. At 2 GM events I have been in the last GM Group out with members allowed back on the tee shortly after. On both occasions I was hassled by the Marshall to speed up when there was no room ahead and nowhere to go if I played through. Was not the fault of our group, we kept up but the members behind saw a group of non members ahead and assumed it must be our fault and the marshall acted on their word.
 
I'm being very serious.
The point I was hoping to make was if the first group out are slow, it doesn't just affect a few groups behind, it would affect all groups.
Whether it be a 4 ball for 5 hours or a 3 ball for 4.30 hours doesn't really matter. The following groups would normally not have any problems keeping up but with nowhere to go, who's going to let who through? Nobody.
If however the first 4 ball nip round in 3.30 hours and the course slows up behind them then there would be 'room' to call groups through and a course marshall wouldn't have any problems identifying any slow groups/players as the gaps open up.

If the first group out on an empty course really do take 5 hours to get round, they should be put at back of field for the next few months!
 
I'm being very serious.
The point I was hoping to make was if the first group out are slow, it doesn't just affect a few groups behind, it would affect all groups.
Whether it be a 4 ball for 5 hours or a 3 ball for 4.30 hours doesn't really matter. The following groups would normally not have any problems keeping up but with nowhere to go, who's going to let who through? Nobody.
If however the first 4 ball nip round in 3.30 hours and the course slows up behind them then there would be 'room' to call groups through and a course marshall wouldn't have any problems identifying any slow groups/players as the gaps open up.

The point I was hoping to make was if the first group out are slow, it doesn't just affect a few groups behind, it would affect all groups.

The first group out certainly has a significant responsibility to apply pace-of-play etiquette properly.

Your timing logic is also flawed. If the 'standard' for the course is 4 hours 30, say, and a quick group can get round in 3:30, then there is plenty of room in front of the slow 1st group for following groups to be let through - in fact 2 hours (approx 9 holes) worth of gap in front.

What has to happen is the slow 1st group let quicker following groups through. That (slow 1st) group may take 5 hours to get round, but it's only them that are taking that long. Other groups are taking much nearer the 'standard' time.

Your logic is flawed!
How so?
You are, in effect, adding the delays and time for distance between holes etc in twice.
 
Last edited:
I'm guessing this is not an entirely hypothetical situation?

Ask Homer

If the first group out on an empty course really do take 5 hours to get round, they should be put at back of field for the next few months!

All clubs have their slow players and most members know who they are. Now I'm not saying they should all be forced to run round the course but at least make sure they dont go out first and may be encouraged to go out a bit later to let the faster groups get on with it.
The sprinters could run round first without being held up, followed by the more stately amongst the membership next, while the wanderers could just take their time with no-one pushing them from behind.
 
I think the length of the time delays isn't that important in this context. The point is this first group has affected so many other players and have set the tone for a large period of the comp. This shouldn't be allowed to happen really should it?
 
Your timing logic is also flawed. If the 'standard' for the course is 4 hours 30, say, and a quick group can get round in 3:30, then there is plenty of room in front of the slow 1st group for following groups to be let through - in fact 2 hours (approx 9 holes) worth of gap in front.

Who said anything about the first group letting anyone through?
 
Fortunately we don't encounter this problem as the first couple of groups are always made up with people from the comps committee who like to run round anyway, therefore no traffic jam builds up early on
 
Who said anything about the first group letting anyone through?

I did ask that question in Post 6 - about extra info being required!

Complaints aren't just at the 1st group then. If the Committee don't stress the importance of playing to time standards and letting quicker groups through, they deserve all the flak they get!

I certainly stated that responsibility, though rarely necessary, to early groups in comps I ran!
 
However!

If the first group takes 5 hours but all other groups, when not held up, play at a pace that allows them round in 3.5 hours then all the groups who tee off after 12.30 when the first group finishes will get round in 3.5 hours. All groups still on the course will complete their round in times increasingly tending towards 3.5 hours depending what part of the course they were on when the slowpokes finished!

:D
 
However!

If the first group takes 5 hours but all other groups, when not held up, play at a pace that allows them round in 3.5 hours then all the groups who tee off after 12.30 when the first group finishes will get round in 3.5 hours. All groups still on the course will complete their round in times increasingly tending towards 3.5 hours depending what part of the course they were on when the slowpokes finished!

:D

exactly- as in post 3
 
Top