Invalid handicap

Are there "non-qualifying comp" scores other than inapplicable forms of play?

I’m not sure the question but if the comp is deemed Non Q then it won’t go to your HC record

For the sake of the expected pendant arriving

You can within your ISV set the competition is ok for handicap scores

Or if the course isn’t at a qualifying standard ( or to satisfy the pendant - acceptable for HC )

When setting up the comp there is an entry requirements where you can set how many “acceptable” scores are required for entry - but the way IG works it allows you to enter but then gives you a warning
 
Last edited:
Clarifying questions - what is a "qualifying score"? Aren't all scores on a player's handicap record "qualified" to be there?
Something that used to exist under the old CONGU Unified Handicap System. Some people continue to use the terminology to describe an "acceptable score".
Following on, some people continue to refer to "qualifying competitions" when referring to "competitions from which scores are acceptable for handicapping"; and "non-qualifying" for those from which scores are not acceptable.

Continued use of this defunct terminology causes much misunderstanding and confusion because they carry additional meaning that is not applicable under WHS.
 
Last edited:
I’m not sure the question but if the comp is deemed Non Q then it won’t go to your HC record
Competitions cannot be "deemed non-qualifying".

Scores are either acceptable for handicapping or they are not. All acceptable scores from competitions must be returned and submitted for handicapping.
 
From our comp handbook

All competitors must have submitted at least eight WHS qualifying scores in the twelve-month period prior to a board competition. Eligible Scores Include:
1. WHS qualifying competitions scores played at 'Figgy' GC
2. General play scores submitted on a qualifying course at 'Figgy' GC
3. Official competitions scores submitted at away courses (verified by WHS records)

Ineligible players will be removed from the entry list prior to Knock-Out Draws and may be removed from a start sheet for stroke-play events if over-subscribed. Note: Ineligible players may appear on the start sheet, but they will not be able to claim any trophy or prize money and may be withdrawn from the results display.
• Some specific events such as the Club Championships, may have further entry conditions based on club competitions played.
 
Is the first line correct? Winter comps, etc?

It’s just about the language

Comps can be deemed “not acceptable for Handicapping”

Which for the man on the street means they are non handicap qualifying

So if the course has been deemed to be “not acceptable for HC’s” then any comps run that day cant be used for scores to go on your HC record

And of course any GP scores can’t be submitted


It’s all nice and simple 😂
 
Is the first line correct? Winter comps, etc?
Yes, it is correct.
If the conditions of WHS Rule 2.1 are met, scores from competitions are acceptable and must be submitted.
There is no provision for a committee to make any kind of declaration as to the handicap status of a competition.

1746636656919.png
 
It’s just about the language

Comps can be deemed “not acceptable for Handicapping”

Which for the man on the street means they are non handicap qualifying

So if the course has been deemed to be “not acceptable for HC’s” then any comps run that day cant be used for scores to go on your HC record

And of course any GP scores can’t be submitted


It’s all nice and simple 😂
Sometimes I wonder if people posting on here are extremely pedantic, wanting to sound cleverer than others or maybe something else. I suspect most people on here know that ‘non qualifying’ and ‘not acceptable for HC’ mean the same thing but they want to use the ‘correct’ terminology. No wonder a lot of people think golf is stuck up
 
Sometimes I wonder if people posting on here are extremely pedantic, wanting to sound cleverer than others or maybe something else. I suspect most people on here know that ‘non qualifying’ and ‘not acceptable for HC’ mean the same thing but they want to use the ‘correct’ terminology. No wonder a lot of people think golf is stuck up
I suspect a lot of it is regurgitating what EG spout and we know there are very much removed from the standard weekend club golfer - a lot of self importance

Most just want to hit the ball , walk after it and hit again and then see what their Handicap is

Some aspects of WHS are good - some a complete mess and some will defend it to the hilt
 
To be fair, or pedantic, all the posts in this thread after #2 have naff all to do with original question in #1.
 
Sometimes I wonder if people posting on here are extremely pedantic, wanting to sound cleverer than others or maybe something else. I suspect most people on here know that ‘non qualifying’ and ‘not acceptable for HC’ mean the same thing but they want to use the ‘correct’ terminology. No wonder a lot of people think golf is stuck up
You may be thinking of some of my posts - however, I'm not in the UK and am trying to understand the discussions that use vernacular/local terminology.
 
Top