Colin L
Tour Winner
Yes our plan for dealing with bunkers is dated 2014.
Maturing nicely, then, as had the rather tasty bottle of wine we drank last night?
Yes our plan for dealing with bunkers is dated 2014.
You need a bottle of something if your unlucky enough to go in a couple.Maturing nicely, then, as had the rather tasty bottle of wine we drank last night?
Thought ours were bad.Agree this can work for some bunker lining materials, but I'm also seeing bitumenised stones being used - bringing genuine injury and club damage risks for courses that do not keep them appropriately maintained.
Agree this can work for some bunker lining materials, but I'm also seeing bitumenised stones being used - bringing genuine injury and club damage risks for courses that do not keep them appropriately maintained.
I think you are drawing a very long bow, but.......Apologies if this was covered earlier in the thread.
When out today I decided to put a rake (that had been left outside its bunker and in a daft place) properly into it’s bunker. I chucked it into the bunker and noticed the sound it made as it landed - and that sound told me instantly that there was not a lot of loose sand in the bunker…at least in the vicinity of where I chucked the rake - which was in the middle of the bunker - in the area a ball hit into the bunker would likely end up.
This has led me to thinking whether doing that could be deemed to be testing the sand if my ball had been in that bunker? Yes I know that I can usually sense depth of sand in a bunker as I walk in it, but the noise the rake made told me very clearly without me actually physically connecting with the sand in the bunker.
Agree with this and the intent to test. In the first instance noted by SwingsLikeHogan, where he would be "caring for the course" by throwing the rake to where it should be, it would be fine, no breach. However, if throwing the rake into the bunker where his ball lies, with the intent of testing, it's a breach.I think you are drawing a very long bow, but.......
It's a self-policing game that requires player integrity. And 12.2b(1) tells you a player must not: Deliberately touch sand in the bunker with a hand, club, rake or other object to test the condition of the sand to learn information for the next stroke. So if you are taking this action for the purpose of testing the sand then you are in breach of the rule. I don't believe you would get any more guidance from an RB.
Lest there be any doubt…my question was purely on what the rules would say rather than me having any thoughts on actually doing what crossed my mind…?Agree with this and the intent to test. In the first instance noted by SwingsLikeHogan, where he would be "caring for the course" by throwing the rake to where it should be, it would be fine, no breach. However, if throwing the rake into the bunker where his ball lies, with the intent of testing, it's a breach.
And I'm a hardliner, any doubt would be resolved against the player!
If you always threw the rake into the bunker, when your ball was still in that bunker, I've no doubt somebody would question why you did that. If you said it was because you can test the depth of the sand, you are going to get a penalty. If you were to throw the rake into the sand before an isolated reason, for some unknown reason, I doubt many would raise an eyebrow to be honest. I am sure there are plenty of times a player would get the rake and bring it somewhere near to where you play the shot, before the shot is played. This will normally require you to drop the rake into a position somewhere near the ball. I think in nearly all cases, this would deemed to be a completely normal action, and nobody is going to think you are doing it for any reason other than convenience.Lest there be any doubt…my question was purely on what the rules would say rather than me having any thoughts on actually doing what crossed my mind…?
Think that was if you left it in with your first attempt.Am I imagining things, but wasn’t there an update to the rules that allowed you to rake a bunker, even if you are yet to play your shot from said bunker, if you are only raking to remove a footprint/rake imprint etc and not to test the sand?
No, you are correct, that is permissable. It is about intent though, a player can't do it if they are doing so to test the sand.Am I imagining things, but wasn’t there an update to the rules that allowed you to rake a bunker, even if you are yet to play your shot from said bunker, if you are only raking to remove a footprint/rake imprint etc and not to test the sand?
That is not the case.Think that was if you left it in with your first attempt.
You can rake the sand then go play your ball if it still in the bunker but not to close to your first attempt.
This might have changed but that’s how I understood it.
Happy to be educated at all times.!
Couldn't you just use a bush like everywhere else?We lightly water our bunkers to keep the sand in them..seems to work quite well.
It can make the bunker shot a little more tricky but the sand is , mostly, consistent
Apologies if this was covered earlier in the thread.
When out today I decided to put a rake (that had been left outside its bunker and in a daft place) properly into it’s bunker. I chucked it into the bunker and noticed the sound it made as it landed - and that sound told me instantly that there was not a lot of loose sand in the bunker…at least in the vicinity of where I chucked the rake - which was in the middle of the bunker - in the area a ball hit into the bunker would likely end up.
This has led me to thinking whether doing that could be deemed to be testing the sand if my ball had been in that bunker? Yes I know that I can usually sense depth of sand in a bunker as I walk in it, but the noise the rake made told me very clearly without me actually physically connecting with the sand in the bunker.
Not sure what other word to use. I simply throw that rack gently into the bunker so that it drops level with the only impression created being of the rake, so no other indentations or ‘skid’ marks.Although, can "chucking" course maintenance equipment ever be considered as 'care for the course' (quite the opposite really)
Not sure what other word to use. I simply throw that rack gently into the bunker so that it drops level with the only impression created being of the rake, so no other indentations or ‘skid’ marks.
Interesting but no mention that the revetted face is artificial and therefore an IO (like the steps)Not sure what other word to use. I simply throw that rack gently into the bunker so that it drops level with the only impression created being of the rake, so no other indentations or ‘skid’ marks.
All our bunkers now have steep reverted faces all round. Head greenie demonstrates how we rake bunkers…and rake positioning. And this is what I do.
(Note for all ‘rulies’ - the video is from April 2018).
Will that ever actually be a factor?Interesting but no mention that the revetted face is artificial and therefore an IO (like the steps)