Help - DQ advice again!!!

sawtooth

Tour Winner
Joined
Jul 1, 2009
Messages
5,253
Location
Berkshire
Visit site
For the second time in a row I have a DQ controversy over my score.

Last time I DQ'd myself as I was processing the cards but today is different, I processed the cards and published the result but then discovered a problem.

I got a lot of micky taking for last time, so I doubled, tripled checked my card before I dropped it into the box after our stableford comp today. I thought all was well so I closed the comp and published the results. In the bar afterwards the capt said somewhat jokingly that "I hope that you got both markers signatures on the card" , and then I instantly knew I could have breached a ruling. I checked the cards and sure enough only 2 signatures , mine and the marker (2nd marker).

At the 9th hole one of our 4 ball retired injured , so with a 3 ball my scorecard was passed to another player to mark for the back nine.

I showed the capt the card and I told him that I need to DQ myself again. He disagreed as the competition was closed and far as he was concerned the result stands.

I didn't win today but my 4th place earned me valuable OOM points (or so I thought) and put me into an unassailable lead with just 1 comp remaining.

Sounds like I have no choice but to retrospectively DQ myself and re-publish the results. Please confirm my fate.
 
Do you need both marker signatures ? Or just the one who finishes marking your card ?
 
What if one of the markers collapses or faints ? How do you get his signature ?
 
That's the kind of nonsense unneccesarily fussy rule that golf doesn't need, it's not like the 2nd marker didn't watch you or talk to you for 9 holes
 
That's the kind of nonsense unneccesarily fussy rule that golf doesn't need, it's not like the 2nd marker didn't watch you or talk to you for 9 holes

that may be the case here, but the rule in intended to cover all situations - the second marker may not have even been playing the first 9 holes.
 
Even if playing the first 9, why should the other player take any notice of a player's score if he not marking for him?
 
Top