gusfordham
Hacker
Thank you to all of you have participated already, the response has been really amazing.
Ahh so you have some population bins or some other grouping?
ANOVAs are rarely suited best to survey data without some kind of binning. Remember to run some sort of pre tests like an F test or similar to determine normalality.
You can transform but I would guess you would end up running some non-parametric alternatives...
Is it age, gender or some other binning you have in mind?
Man I miss talking stats, I’m far from an expert however, rank amateur really.
Thank you to all of you have participated already, the response has been really amazing.
Whilst well worded and stimulating I have to agree with coach that there is a huge difference between a competitive situation as a whole, and specific instances within one.
Simple example to illustrate.on a shot basis the visualisation of a successful outcome is a significant positive - from a competition perspective is can be disastrous (getting ahead of the moment).
Approaching a shot with a positive mindset (I'm a good iron player, putter etc is good, believing yourself be good when you are really poor is bad long term!
I also found the early question regarding training to be far to open to interpretation to deliver anything meaningful- does this include participation or is it specific golf practice and/or dedicated physical training?
On balance it's way better than most that turn up here, but I also believe it leads the witness a little too much!
Good luck in your endeavour
Thank you for your comments, I agree it's quite a general piece of research, it's my first official piece of research that i'm conducting so we decided to keep it quite general. In terms of the training, it was just to gather a bit more background info on participants and isn't a significant factor for the testing.
Appreciate that re training, but would suggest something more along the lines of a playing/practicing/training deliniation to gain meaningful insight into the individual and how they currently approach the game.
I've completed it. I felt like there were a few repeated questions though. The question about 'do you psyche yourself up for a competition' was there twice and also 'do you set yourself performance goals/targets' was there about three times with slightly different wordings.
I've completed it. I felt like there were a few repeated questions though. The question about 'do you psyche yourself up for a competition' was there twice and also 'do you set yourself performance goals/targets' was there about three times with slightly different wordings.
I've completed it too.
Found some if the questions quite interestingly worded. Personally after studying (for personal interest only) sports psychology over the past 20 years my perspective is a bit different to how you are presenting your questions. For me I want to almost down play the importance of competitive rounds (whether that be medals / matchplay or interclub matches), and deliberately not psyche myself up for them, doing this does not help me to achieve optimal performance I have found. The saying practice like you play and play like you practice is one that has always resonated with me.
One thing is for sure there is plenty to discuss when it comes to Sports Psychology and learning techniques - all the best with it.
That's fair enough. As a person who's completing the survey though, my feedback is that I find it annoying to be asked the same question several times. :lol: Good luck with the results and whatnot.This was an intended measure, this simply creates sub sections for my results and creates averages and helps prevents people filling out the same answer for each question. This hopefully therefore provides greater accuracy and validity for my research.
That's fair enough. As a person who's completing the survey though, my feedback is that I find it annoying to be asked the same question several times. :lol: Good luck with the results and whatnot.