Eco warriors.

So just to add a viewpoint that doesn't seem to have been covered, I think the current approach or eco-warriors is very flawed. If you tell people they have to roll back their lifestyles, all you will meet is huge resistance, once people have enjoyed flying to new places, having a car, eating meat etc.. the majority will not want to give this up, and telling them to do so will just get their backs up, rather than get them to agree.

In practice, I think the best option would be for eco-warriors to push for things that people will get behind - such as funding for science and technology that makes the things we currently enjoy cleaner, renewable energy, reforestation of certain areas etc.. People would get behind this, and support them, but disrupting people and telling them they have to give up a whole bunch of things that they enjoy is not a great strategy.

The above approach may take slightly longer to slow down, stop and reverse the impacts, but it will be more successful long term, as realistically most people will only really consider giving up things when they feel personally impacted, which for the UK will not be for some time yet.
 
Let's not kid ourselves about our 'democracy'. Nothing, especially that works against the interests of its sponsors, happens without direct action.
I'm guessing the distopian future which is heading out way might be a little bit inconvenient as well. Might even disrupt a few tee times...
 
They have people talking, they have publicity but they have alienated and angered so many. The publicity is negative not positive so I'm not sure it is mission accomplished.

Yes they have triggered the Daily Mail and a few posters on a golf forum but as they say, there's no such thing as bad publicity.
 
I learnt more about the issue by watching the DA program last night in the beeb.

Sums up just how effective their protest is to me.
The press are reporting on the issues surrounding their actions rather than what they sterling it for.
 
Yes they have triggered the Daily Mail and a few posters on a golf forum but as they say, there's no such thing as bad publicity.

If that were true, we should reverse the libel laws, so that the publisher of the false story gets compensation! ;)

On a more serious note, whilst the publicity may be good for raising the profile of XR, it doesn't mean it is good for getting public approval of their agenda or making people change their behaviours re climate change.
 
And what can I ask are all you doing to avert the catastrophe of climate change and the general destruction of the environment? or are you happy to sit back hope someone else fixes it?

I have a suspicion that whatever I currently do and whatever I've done in the past couple of decades wont really matter to you if I typed it out

However I can guarantee that what I do/did clearly wasn't sufficient because there are protesters on the streets of London telling me it's not enough. So regardless whether I took one counter measure or 500 it really didn't matter a jot did it?
 
If that were true, we should reverse the libel laws, so that the publisher of the false story gets compensation! ;)

On a more serious note, whilst the publicity may be good for raising the profile of XR, it doesn't mean it is good for getting public approval of their agenda or making people change their behaviours re climate change.

Their main aim may not be to directly influence the public but to impact government policy which will then lead to changes in behaviour.
 
That's dependant on the person I guess, I have 6 kids the reason why is beacuse they're all brilliant and bring joy to our family and each other. But flip side of that I question why some people people have any when I see how they parent their kids.

But along with having them the great thing is they're educated on this modern world. How to recycle, not using excessive power or water, they all walk to school or use a bike even the littlest ones it's a 40 minute walk to school for my youngest 3 and they do it it without complaining. This is the point we need to start at make small changes now so our kids can continue to make them as they grow and hopefully somehow their generation and subsequent ones will see the planet heal or prosper.

Sorry for delayed reply been trying to formulate something that doesn’t sound totally selfish lol

I don’t like change. Like really don’t. I didn’t move out my parents until I could afford a 3 bed semi, so me and wife lived here 4.5 years now. We have 1 child who is almost 2. We going to have 2 but I don’t like moving (too much change) so we are getting a loft extension for us (suits my shift working) and the kids can be downstairs with a big sized room each and the box room for guests / drying washing.

I know I can provide a comfortable life for the 4 of us. 5 would be a push. I want to be able to go on holidays with them all without spending a fortune! Same with cars I don’t wnna have to get a 7 seater to fit us all lol

Sounds stupid I know.

Also on the none selfish part I want to be able to provide both kids with a house deposit when their around 25

I’m aiming to retire at 60 (28 years) so that’s ties in almost perfect with that

I couldn’t imagine the work 3 let alone 6 kids takes. We got 1 sorted. 2 is gonna kill me
 
Hopefully they will have the sense not to get involved in the other demo taking place today. Wonder how they would have coped during last weeks Rolling Thunder demo. 22,000 (police figures) motorbikes would have given them a fit.
 
... would you like me to explain thermo physics ...

Yes please! As I've never heard of that! And I used to teach Physics!

But I agree with your answer to LPP's (repeated) question. It's not 'our' role to implement a/the 'solution'; simply to comply with whatever is deemed to be 'the solution'. Identifying and implementing 'the solution' is up to Government(s).

That's actually why I support reasonable protest - even if it inconveniences me - about the lack of progress on the issue. However, some of the protest appears to have been OTT!
 
Yes please! As I've never heard of that! And I used to teach Physics!

But I agree with your answer to LPP's (repeated) question. It's not 'our' role to implement a/the 'solution'; simply to comply with whatever is deemed to be 'the solution'. Identifying and implementing 'the solution' is up to Government(s).

That's actually why I support reasonable protest - even if it inconveniences me - about the lack of progress on the issue. However, some of the protest appears to have been OTT!
Doesn't it all come under the heading of thermodynamics- just asking. I was under the (wrong) impression you were an English teacher who specialised in (){} &[].
 
Top