Mudball
Assistant Pro
From Twitter
Nor do I! That's not gambling though! It's a demonstration of your confidence (or lack thereof) in what you post!
But my point has been made! Even you don't believe that what you post will happen will happen!
Now that WOULD be gambling! Actually that would be a 'sure to lose' one too!...
I think it might rain this afternoon,
Bet you £10 it does not.
...
Really, So why are you enticing me to make a bet with you.
I think it might rain this afternoon,
Bet you £10 it does not.
Checked through the forum rules and it does say that I am allowed to have an opinion.
Jeremy Hunt seems intend on grabbing quite a bit of the limelight whenever he can - most recently yesterday in the HoC when questioning Hancock on current and ongoing testing policy for care homes....
Btw. I don't seem to have received a reply about my proposed wager about him still being PM at Christmas! Or have you simply donated the tenner to H4H directly?
That's stretching it somewhat by saying the buck stops with him. In that case every decision made throughout the political machinery is his personal responsibility.Ultimately, it's BoJo's! As per the sign on Pres. Truman's desk!
And it seems (at least to me) to have been a 'policy' decision - so political.
Oh, and the NHS is overseen/controlled by Government through Department of Health and Social Care - run by Matt Hancock.
That's stretching it somewhat by saying the buck stops with him. In that case every decision made throughout the political machinery is his personal responsibility.
Yes, exactly that, he may not make every decision, but as Leader he has ultimate responsibility for those decisions.That's stretching it somewhat by saying the buck stops with him. In that case every decision made throughout the political machinery is his personal responsibility.
So someone in the NHS makes a bad decision then we should blame Boris for it and the people that made the decision get a free pass. Come on, how can anyone be held personally responsible for all decisions made by the complete state system. Truman didnt and neither could anyone else and it's not what he meant anyhow, he as the head of Government took responsibility for decisions made by government. If a Surgeon decided to give cancer breast surgery to women that didnt have cancer should we personally blame Boris ?Indeed.. gone are the days of taking responsibility, morals and values.. Welcome to the new normal.
![]()
That's stretching it somewhat by saying the buck stops with him. In that case every decision made throughout the political machinery is his personal responsibility.
Twaddle!That's stretching it somewhat by saying the buck stops with him. In that case every decision made throughout the political machinery is his personal responsibility.
You've just written/made/agreed the compelling argument of why you original reply was twaddle!... Truman didnt and neither could anyone else and it's not what he meant anyhow, he as the head of Government took responsibility for decisions made by government....
As mentioned 'The Queen' but the kind of logic you're suggesting is utter 'Twaddle'Twaddle!
But certainly the overall responsibility for decisions/actions is his - notwithstanding the slight clouding by the UK concept of 'Cabinet responsibility' that differs somewhat from the US political hierarchy/responsibilities.
Where else would 'the buck' (aka responsibility!) get passed to?
Dissenters will always get into stretching things to absurdity. Actually since it is the Queen who invites/requests the ballot winners to form a Government and select a PM and Cabinet it's obvious the 'buck' stops with her!
A few hundred years ago, maybe, but not these days! The monarch 'reigns' but doesn't 'rule' these days!As mentioned 'The Queen' but the kind of logic you're suggesting is utter 'Twaddle'
Yes, it's as silly as personally Blaming Boris for every decision made in the State system, as I said 'Twaddle'A few hundred years ago, maybe, but not these days! The monarch 'reigns' but doesn't 'rule' these days!
Dissenters will always get into stretching things to absurdity. Actually since it is the Queen who invites/requests the ballot winners to form a Government and select a PM and Cabinet it's obvious the 'buck' stops with her!
Ceremonially maybe - and I doubt even there. In practice, she is compelled to follow procedure (has no choice) therefore 'the buck' never gets to her - except for a few very specific procedural tasks/situations!Dissenters will always get into stretching things to absurdity. Actually since it is the Queen who invites/requests the ballot winners to form a Government and select a PM and Cabinet it's obvious the 'buck' stops with her!
Yes, it would indeed be silly to do so! However, the only poster who has suggested that is you!Yes, it's as silly as personally Blaming Boris for every decision made in the State system, as I said 'Twaddle'