fundy
Ryder Cup Winner
Do they use it during ODI or T20 ?
india dont no, they had to in the recent world cup but thats about it
Do they use it during ODI or T20 ?
india dont no, they had to in the recent world cup but thats about it
I expect with the amount of times an umpire gets it wrong will start to turn their heads further round
Can see it being used by them all soon it enough
That's where the funding for it needs to come direct from the ICCits got to go one way or another, either they all use it or it gets scrapped, think theres a fair chance of either considering Indias stance, also a few other boards struggle to afford it
That's where the funding for it needs to come direct from the ICC
If it gets scrapped as a tool on the pitch then it's going to be a nightmare for the umpires because every single decision will be analysed by the pundits and every mistake highlighted
yep, we go back to where we were but with even more scrutiny
the funding argument is actually helping Indias cause too, basically their view being if the ICC has to pay for it then they are paying the lions share so they should have the say!
easier in countries like England and Aus where the tv companies basically provide it as part of their contract, not as easy in WI and the Asian countries
The cricket boards aren't short of money though - even make so with the amount of money they are gained from their various franchise T20 comps they hold
It will need to come to a head soon enough
Some of them are, Sri Lankan board are essentially skint (they often run into problems when they dont play their players for several mths), Pakistan and West Indies also not overly strong financially either. Definitely 2 tiers financially within the game and the gap being forced wider by the "haves"
Some of them are, Sri Lankan board are essentially skint (they often run into problems when they dont play their players for several mths), Pakistan and West Indies also not overly strong financially either. Definitely 2 tiers financially within the game and the gap being forced wider by the "haves"
Wonder how much touring teams earn from playing away ?
I know Pakistan have been hit badly since not playing at home in recent years
Depends on the arrangements with the home team but this is where the gap is growing with the big sides keeping higher proportion of the revenues, especially India, and the littler guys cant do much to stop it as the ICC is toothless (and controlled by the BCCI)
Also, theres been a reduction in the number of games the smaller sides are getting from the bigger sides, limiting their income further
Not long before a two tier system in place to push smaller sides away ? Will it be a case of the big sides just playing each other on a rotation ?
The Indian Board remains resolutely opposed to DRS in general and Hawkeye in particular and it is difficult to see them changing (or being forced to change) their position in the foreseeable future.
Was there not another system considered before Hawkeye got chosen? Do the Indian board have any stake in that one and hence aren't prepared to accept a different system?
Not as far as I am aware.
I know that there were several systems (including Hawkeye) under consideration for "goal-line technology" in football but not in cricket.