MegaSteve
Tour Winner
RA has reputedly spent a billion quid to date on CFC...
Money well spent?
Money well spent?
Come and support the Palace - we won again today...![]()
Worrying times for you,they are in freefall at the moment.
Don't be so hard on yourself.....let's face it you could be a Rangers fan.:rofl:
Rumours sweeping Scotland that they may actually go out of business by the end of next week and they are going to be hit with a 60 point deduction due to the third party contract fiasco..my heart bleeds.(see what I did there?!):whoo:
Be careful what you wish for, celtic could go the same way if they did, once the new Tv deal comes up for re-negotiation.
Shouldn't wish for anyone to go bust.
Chelsea's problems, IMHO:
Scolari, Avram Grant and Ancelotti kept the status quo going of allowing Lampard, Terry and Drogba a lot of of influence in the dressing room. It was ok when they were younger and still fantastic players (and winning trophies), but they have all aged and lost some form together over the last 1-2 seasons. This has led to a lack of opportunities for young up and coming or new players into the Chelsea team.
Abramovic should have backed Ancellotti or even Grant, who nearly won them a European cup, but due to his obsessive lust to win the Champs league, means he hasn't had any patience with them, despite getting to finals and semi-finals nearly every year. Also shouldn't have undermined Ancelotti by sacking Wilkins.
He will get them back up there again by giving a new manager £200 million, but it may not be enough this time , what with Man City and Fergie still getting the best out of a Man U side, which does not have a vintage midfield (or does?).
Anyway, my team has more than enough problems ............
Why would we go bust if tv money was reduced? The club would cut it's cloth accordingly as has been done many times recently by us but not by them.
Personally I couldn't give a flying feck if they go tits up.
![]()
I'm not saying you would but TV revenue is one of the biggest incomes in football now, sometimes even more than what comes through the turnstiles. 4 less old firm games, plus cup games (all full houses). I doubt the other teams (not including Celtic) would do as well in Europe, so the co-efficients would change. May then mean the league winners (Celtic 19 out of 20 times) would have to start in the champs league 3rd round qualifiers.
I think within 5 years Celtic would be playing in front of less than 30,000 each week, due to lack of interest, which would not help to pay off that big (brilliant) stadium.
Just the slippery slope.....
I would be willing to take the chance.Our game is fecked anyhow,this might just get a re-structuring that is sorely needed.........or may lead to something else that would benefit Celtic.
The Stadium is paid for by the way.
Fair play on the stadium, I thought it would have been over a 20-30 year mortgage. Was it cheap? I know Sunderland did theirs on the cheap a few years ago(16 mill, I think), without much "filigree".