So whats wrong with that. He has been carrying out a research and development project which he hoped would produce a new generation of electric car. He is carrying on with the development of batteries but has decided car production is no longer viable.
I know that every country has red tape, we export worldwide. I can't comment about recruiting workers etc, only shipping goods. My point was that whilst there is red tape in all countries around the world the EU are adding additional layers to ones already imposed by other countries. We are all aware life will be different to how it is now, they are just adding extra barriers to other countries.
Whats any of this to do with Dysons electric car development?
Er...What hypocrisy?Just exposing Dyson's hypocrisy
...
I keep explaining that the simple resolution is a free trade agreement, its not a complex concept, its not even difficult to initiate. I would suggest a compromise to the current situation would be an immediate transition period where everything is placed on hold while trade talks commence. The only objection to that can be from those who deny Brexit happening.
If you believe Dyson was a hypocrite then explain your reasoning for it as it sure beats me why you say it.Just exposing Dyson's hypocrisy
"If remainers had accepted a democratic vote" has just become a vacuous platitude. Which remainers are you talking about, and how would that have affected the process thus far?
I struggle to see any remainers, or anyone at all, that can single handledly resolve the impasse of the UK wanting to leave the customs union but not impose a border between NI/Ireland.
For what it's worth I think the majority of people accept the 2016 vote, it is the realities of the outcome that are causing the issues.
We are here because a large part of the Tory party are hard line brexiteers and voted against the original deal. You make the poor assumption that everyone who voted remain is unable to accept the result. This is also not true , just do it properly in a controlled manner that has as little negative impact as possible
So that'll be another 6 (or even10) years (going by how long the Canada FTA took) of planning/negotiation before that's settled! Meanwhil;e UK remains in the EU, where, surprise surprise, trade between EU and UK is free!!
Likewise, you make 'the poor assumption', or at least the implication, that the original deal was scuppered by 'hard line brexiteers'. In fact it was rejected by a significant majority in the Commons, 3 times, because it was a poor deal that, potentially/likely, did not achieve Leave at all!
The opposition are not obliged to vote in favour. If may hadn't been so poorly advised and assume she'd sweep up the brexit vote in a GE, may be things would have been different.
As we are in the EU now its not such a task to unferstand how a free trade agreement should work. Surely the one with Canada is a good template. 6 to 10 years is not realistic, how long did the Japan one take?
They are not obliged to vote against either.
Thank goodness for Gina Miller 😉😉
Indeed! Otherwise May would likely have signed it off using 'Royal prerogative' and we'd be 'out' but effectively still 'in'!!
But we would then be in the transition period and able to negotiate the FTA that Socket suggests when he stated: "I would suggest a compromise to the current situation would be an immediate transition period where everything is placed on hold while trade talks commence"
