Brexit - or Article 50: the Phoenix!

Status
Not open for further replies.
I really don't get why we would propose what sounds like an incredibly complicated solution to the border if straightforward solutions as Bri has talked about are already implemented and are out there. We simply propose these solutions with the evidence that they work. And we will then see whether the EU is being deliberately obstructive and bloody minded over the border.

 
The EU negotiators seem to have lost patience with LBJ and cast him adrift.

Going to be a couple of interesting days ahead.

Patel gets cheered by the misguided at Manchester for ending UK citizens right to freedom of movement...sad day for normal human beings.

I presume you are talking about freedom of movement in a very small part of the world
 
I really don't get why we would propose what sounds like an incredibly complicated solution to the border if straightforward solutions as Bri has talked about are already implemented and are out there. We simply propose these solutions with the evidence that they work. And we will then see whether the EU is being deliberately obstructive and bloody minded over the border.
Quite simply because they don't exist yet. All countries that border the EU that are not part of the EEA have infrastructure at the border for major crossings including checkpoints, areas for marshaling lorries and overhead gantries. Lorries are stopped at the border and there are immigration controls. Whilst there are some technological efficiencies in place, such as the rail sensors Hobbit mentioned, it doesn't take away the fact these border controls are in place and that is the issue with the Irish border. The backstop was the only really workable solution, which the EU suggested sat within the Irish sea. It was the UK that then asked to include the whole of the UK, which is a point the EU conceded when they agreed to that change.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jp5
I know this has nothing to do with Brexit but rather than start a new political thread, I thought I would post this here.

There have been countless posts here about Brexit, bashing MP's from all sides and in some cases deserved. This is a wee reminder that each and every MP is also a human being and they are not all lying, cheating scumbags.

I've been an avid follower of politics for many years and this is one of the best, most moving and courageous contributions I have ever seen in the HoC's and I urge you all to watch it.

The MP making the speech is Rosie Duffield MP.

 
I heard an MP from the RoI being interviewed yesterday. He was railing against the Johnson plan, being entirely against any form of customs check even if nowhere near a border. The plan was not acceptable to him, he was quite grand about it. The interviewer then asked what would happen if the EU rejected the proposal and the UK left without a deal. 'Oh, there would have to be border checks' :unsure:.

So, the option is watered down border checks or full on border checks. Perhaps the Irish and the EU need to look at this as a least worst option rather than holding out for something that has been rejected so frequently and clearly that it is obviously a dead idea. The perfect scenario is not achievable for either side, it is compromise time.
 
I know this has nothing to do with Brexit but rather than start a new political thread, I thought I would post this here.

There have been countless posts here about Brexit, bashing MP's from all sides and in some cases deserved. This is a wee reminder that each and every MP is also a human being and they are not all lying, cheating scumbags.

I've been an avid follower of politics for many years and this is one of the best, most moving and courageous contributions I have ever seen in the HoC's and I urge you all to watch it.

The MP making the speech is Rosie Duffield MP.

Was an exceptional contribution which all MPs should learn from. The unfortunate lady has had personal experience of the problem.
 
I heard an MP from the RoI being interviewed yesterday. He was railing against the Johnson plan, being entirely against any form of customs check even if nowhere near a border. The plan was not acceptable to him, he was quite grand about it. The interviewer then asked what would happen if the EU rejected the proposal and the UK left without a deal. 'Oh, there would have to be border checks' :unsure:.

So, the option is watered down border checks or full on border checks. Perhaps the Irish and the EU need to look at this as a least worst option rather than holding out for something that has been rejected so frequently and clearly that it is obviously a dead idea. The perfect scenario is not achievable for either side, it is compromise time.

But they (EU) are still holding out for us not to leave, and hence no border. Why compromise, if there is still the slightest chance that by not compromising so, we don't leave.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top