Blue in Munich
Crocked Professional Yeti Impersonator
Thoughts from German Parliament
Far too sensible, no chance of that being adopted, sadly.
Thoughts from German Parliament
Did you read the article you posted? This is a direct quote from it.....
Some commentators have misinterpreted the ruling as reimposing a blasphemy law across Europe but this is not the case. All the European Court has done is ruled that those states that do have blasphemy laws can maintain and enforce them. It does not re-impose blasphemy laws on states that do not have such laws, and does not in any way reverse the decision taken by Irish voters on Friday to repeal Ireland’s law. Nonetheless, the ruling is still a bad one, as it would have been hoped that the Court would move towards striking down blasphemy laws across Europe.
It's still completely up to the local electorate as to whether they want a blasphemy law. Woukd you have preferred that they insisted that a national law be repealed? I thought that was exactly what was wrong with the EU?
Taxes are to take your money off you and spend it on what someone else thinks it should be spent on. Why not keep it and spend it on things you want.Getting bored of these Tory give away budgets now to try and blindside voters into “your better off under us†it’s lovely to have an extra £30 pcm (£70 saved in tax but £40 more NI) , these are with next years changes ofc, however I’d rather you take that extra £30 and maybe fund some under funded schools.. or the nhs.. or anything really
My wife is £10 more pcm better off
So that £40 let’s call it on average £20 per house hold in the uk a month .. that’s £240 a year tax saved.. again let’s round down call it £200 per house hold per year
27 million households in the uk
£200 per house hold
That’s
£5400000000 per year that could be far better used! Considering people are paying this now their used to it.. weren’t expecting anything so just leave it alone and use the money!
Correct me if I’m wrong but isn’t that what taxes are for? To pay for things?!
Well that's my question avoided. I'll do you the courtesy of answering your question seeing as you seem intent on not answering mine.Yes I read it, I particularly agree with this comment “With this judgment, the ECtHR has effectively upheld Austria’s domestic laws that in effect criminalise legitimate speech about certain religionsâ€
Do you think that’s what the ECtHR should be doing? Are you happy that the ECtHR can’t be relied upon to intervene in favour of free speech.?
all this reading on the taxes etc combined with the "should I buy a diesel thread" and the repercussions for fuel duty and vehicle duty in the long term got me thinking about how much money the government gets each year through those taxes, along with VAT etc etc
The estimated income for 2019 is £776bn ...... I'd love to know how that money is spent.
The biggest bills will be for the welfare state and the NHS. The welfare state bill is staggering
"In the financial year ending 2017, the UK government spent £264 billion on welfare, which made up 34% of all government spending." - Office of National Statistics.
NHS was approx £125bn in the same period.
Not arguing at all but I'm at work and can't check. It would be interesting if you split up the "Welfare" costs into their individual sections. For example, pensions, in work benefits etc.The biggest bills will be for the welfare state and the NHS. The welfare state bill is staggering
"In the financial year ending 2017, the UK government spent £264 billion on welfare, which made up 34% of all government spending." - Office of National Statistics.
NHS was approx £125bn in the same period.
Sorry, I wasn't trying to make a point, just answering the question. You are correct, welfare covers a huge area, not just work benefits. I googled it and this came up from the Office of National Statistics. There may be a way to break it down further but I just did a quick check. No angle to it.Not arguing at all but I'm at work and can't check. It would be interesting if you split up the "Welfare" costs into their individual sections. For example, pensions, in work benefits etc.
The reason this is vital is that when you simply state "Welfare", some people immediately assume that it's out of work benefits that you're talking about
very very interesting figures. I was also just reading how we've spent £4bn on improving the roads and railways in other countries.....bearing in mind the state of our own.
Anyway.....I dont want to hijack this thread further!
Well - if ST report is true is that BINO? Mind you anything that has Peter Bone frothing and the mouth should have me celebrating - and with Arron Banks squirming and avoiding on Marr I could be doubly so. But we seem to be damage limitation country - where there is little being talked of the great future - but quite a lot that seems to be the least worse option. Best damage limitation exercise? Don't do it.
The only thing I find interesting about it is that State pensions can be considered a benefit.
Are you expecting me to confirm something you already think?Maybe you could explain what is interesting about it?
Ouch! Bit snappy tonight. I did rethink my post and edit it.Are you expecting me to confirm something you already think?
It's interesting because I suspect that quite a few people think that Welfare is more to do with Out of Work benefits. I already said this in a previous post.
Out of interest, what prejudiced view did you expect me to have? I could hazard a guess but I'll admit if I'm wrong.
It was written with a smile. And I was right as well.Ouch! Bit snappy tonight. I did rethink my post and edit it.