Reading this at the moment, I think it is as good as the rest of the series and always find them interesting. I like to read some and then google so of the items discussed in the book to see if they are real (most are) and get a bit of background information to build upon the storyline.
It’s just not done it for me this one. Feels to forced in trying to put it all together compared to the natural flow of how others in the series.
There’s no reference/link to the past books in name or description just a brief mention that Langdon has seen plenty in the past (I’m paraphrasing but you get the gist)
I'm about 8 in. Vigilante series. If you like that sort of thing it's decent enough. It follows a formula but don't they all. They are an easy read, popcorn stuff.
. I find that very annoying but I just brush over those pages.
Yes, finished the Milton seriesI'm about 8 in. Vigilante series. If you like that sort of thing it's decent enough. It follows a formula but don't they all. They are an easy read, popcorn stuff.
Not as deep as Bosch, not as good as earlier Reacher.
The author does insist on explaining the background in every book, then each key thing in each book in subsequent books. As though you'd pick up book 6 and need an explanation for everything that's happened before
Have you tried the Milton series? Similar type of thing. They are a level up, very good.
Really enjoyed them. He really builds the characters over the books and there's a bit of nice gentle humour in them as well.
