Dave B
Q-School Graduate
After reading another thread regarding ball fitting I'm slightly bemused by what some people constitute to be the correct ball for the job and exactly what they expect of the ball they use.
In addition as amateurs do we sometimes choose a ball based on what the pro's can do with a ball, rather than using a ball to suit our abilities.
The way I look at it have three price breaks for balls:
£10 per dozen budget balls
£15 price mark for good functional balls
£20+ premium balls for competition
In the £10 category we have TaylorMade/Maxfly Noodles, Pinnacle Gold Precision and Srixon Distance to name some of the better balls within this category
In the £15 category we have the Srixon AD333 and Green Soft Feel, Titliest DT Solo, Wilson DX2/3 soft Nike Soft etc
In the £20+ category we have the Titliest Pro V's, Srixon Z Star, Callaway IZ Tour, Bridgestone 330 Tour etc
I've tried the majority of the above balls and I tend to stick with Yellow Pinnacle Gold Precisions for winter work and change between the Srixon AD333's, Srixon Green Soft and the Soft Wilson DX2's for most of my summer work with Wilson DX3's for competitions.
I've tried the Titliests and don't particularly get on with them however I did like the Callaway IZ tour and the Bridgestone however I don't think that they offer anything that the Wilson DX3 gives me at half the price. I've also tried a lot of balls twice the price of the Pinnacle Precisions which in my opinion aren't as good.
Am I the only one who thinks that we are led by fashion and marketing rather than using quality products what will actually do a very good job?
Or am I totally missing the point in that if I pay a higher premium for my balls they will knock shots off my score?
In addition as amateurs do we sometimes choose a ball based on what the pro's can do with a ball, rather than using a ball to suit our abilities.
The way I look at it have three price breaks for balls:
£10 per dozen budget balls
£15 price mark for good functional balls
£20+ premium balls for competition
In the £10 category we have TaylorMade/Maxfly Noodles, Pinnacle Gold Precision and Srixon Distance to name some of the better balls within this category
In the £15 category we have the Srixon AD333 and Green Soft Feel, Titliest DT Solo, Wilson DX2/3 soft Nike Soft etc
In the £20+ category we have the Titliest Pro V's, Srixon Z Star, Callaway IZ Tour, Bridgestone 330 Tour etc
I've tried the majority of the above balls and I tend to stick with Yellow Pinnacle Gold Precisions for winter work and change between the Srixon AD333's, Srixon Green Soft and the Soft Wilson DX2's for most of my summer work with Wilson DX3's for competitions.
I've tried the Titliests and don't particularly get on with them however I did like the Callaway IZ tour and the Bridgestone however I don't think that they offer anything that the Wilson DX3 gives me at half the price. I've also tried a lot of balls twice the price of the Pinnacle Precisions which in my opinion aren't as good.
Am I the only one who thinks that we are led by fashion and marketing rather than using quality products what will actually do a very good job?
Or am I totally missing the point in that if I pay a higher premium for my balls they will knock shots off my score?
Last edited: