D
Deleted Member 1156
Guest
Then why would companies bother to engineer feel into golf equipment? Why not just use ultra durable rubber for balls and reinforced steel for golf clubs? Every time a new ball or club comes out, it's always touted as the new level in feel and softer. Why would they bother to do that if the difference was not discernible and the choice was not open to personal preference? Has a ball ever been advertised on the basis of being "reassuringly rock hard"? The answer is no because there is difference and human beings are capable of selecting a golf ball based on feel even when it's on the club face for a fraction of a second. It's why companies have also dropped the compression rating (as a means for selection) for balls because the feel is a more important overall factor. I've yet to see a pro who put a ball into play that he or she didn't like the feel of. Feel is everything - and it's also a valid point in selecting a golf ball. And as for the original premise of this thread - fitting a golf ball to suit a driver isn't a sensible approach to golf ball selection.
I'm really starting to think your posts are some sort of windup.
I play the majority of my golf on links courses where spin control is everything. It affects the flight of the ball and the amount of check I get on the greens. Why would I choose a ball that 'feels' good off the putter face over these other factors?