Asking for advice

But it's factual information that the FC may not be aware of and may influence the way he plays in future i.e. "advice". Passing on factual information can be construed as "advising" e.g. "I advised him that he was swinging 30 degrees past the horizontal"
That is due to the improper use of the word "advise." People use it today to convey the simple phrase of bygone days "told." ("I told him he was swinging improperly.") For some reason "advise" sounds more important and official so it has fallen into use. It does not mean advice as used in the rules.
 
Last edited:
That is due to the improper use of the word "advise." People use it today to convey the simple phrase of bygone days "told." ("I told him he was swinging improperly.") For some reason "advise" sounds more important and official so it has fallen into use. It does not mean advice as used in the rules.

Not 'improper', so much as changing/evolving. I blame you (American) lot for much of it with sales patter! I once saw an example of such language describing, in about 200 words of flowery language, what seemed like a complicated connecting device, invoiced (to DoD) at $4000 per item. Turned out to be a standard nut and bolt!! :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Really interesting discussion.

There is a fine line and we need to think about the purpose of the rule. We know from decision 8-1/8 Comment About Club Selection After Stroke that a a casual remark is not regarded as advice.

In my mind saying "That went exactly where you were aiming" is not really advice and more like a casual remark. It doesn't say the player should or shouldn't do anything specific and as as others have noted it is a non-judgemental statement of fact. It is not a "counsel or suggestion" and in my view is materially different to saying, "Your problem is you are lining up incorrectly" or, "You are lining up too far to the left" which I think would be advice.

This is an area of the rules where I think there is some degree of "interpretation". I also think based on Decision 8-1/8 there is also an element of intent.

Which of these might be "advice"?

1. "Great swing, lovely tempo, keep swinging like that today and you'll have a great round".

2. "You have been driving really well today, it's the last hole, make sure you keep your tempo on this one"

3. "You are swinging too fast. You need to slow it down."​

To be honest I'm not really sure about 1 and 2. I would guess though that many of us would be a bit a shocked if after a comment like those the player said "Thanks and by the way that's a 2 shot penalty to you"!

I think this would be great topic for the Rules section in the mag particularly in the light of discussions about saying "take your time" when someone is about to tap in a short putt.
 
I think the problem that this thread has highlighted is that it is possible to give advice if you are careful with the language you use with being pulled up for it, that is why in my opinion almost all of it would not be allowed by the R&A.
 
Freddie, a remark made to a fellow competitor will either be advice in terms of the Rules, or not. Not being pulled up for saying something that was advice doesn't change the status of what was said. It is still advice.

That pedantic quibble apart, I don't doubt that statements 2 and 3 that Mashie put forward are advice. It would he harsh indeed to rule that a sporting encouragement to a fellow competitor like the first one was advice. It is so generalised, amounting in my mind to no more than a conditional and glaringly obvious "if you swing well, you will play well" without saying anything in particular about how to swing well.
 
Re reading my earlier post I think it lost something in editing. Example 3 is maybe too obvious.

Something like

"That was a really quick swing, you usually hit the ball better when you swing more slowly"

might be a bit more border line.
 
Really interesting discussion.

There is a fine line and we need to think about the purpose of the rule. We know from decision 8-1/8 Comment About Club Selection After Stroke that a a casual remark is not regarded as advice.

In my mind saying "That went exactly where you were aiming" is not really advice and more like a casual remark. It doesn't say the player should or shouldn't do anything specific and as as others have noted it is a non-judgemental statement of fact. It is not a "counsel or suggestion" and in my view is materially different to saying, "Your problem is you are lining up incorrectly" or, "You are lining up too far to the left" which I think would be advice.

This is an area of the rules where I think there is some degree of "interpretation". I also think based on Decision 8-1/8 there is also an element of intent.

Which of these might be "advice"?

1. "Great swing, lovely tempo, keep swinging like that today and you'll have a great round".

2. "You have been driving really well today, it's the last hole, make sure you keep your tempo on this one"

3. "You are swinging too fast. You need to slow it down."​

To be honest I'm not really sure about 1 and 2. I would guess though that many of us would be a bit a shocked if after a comment like those the player said "Thanks and by the way that's a 2 shot penalty to you"!

I think this would be great topic for the Rules section in the mag particularly in the light of discussions about saying "take your time" when someone is about to tap in a short putt.

If this comment was made to by a FC following me hitting the ball well left of 'the line' - I could easily imagine responding "Yes I know - I just hit it wrong - I meant to fade the shot but just hit it straight"

But if I asked a FC if I was aiming to the left that seems to me to be a different kettle of fish.
 
If this comment was made to by a FC following me hitting the ball well left of 'the line' - I could easily imagine responding "Yes I know - I just hit it wrong - I meant to fade the shot but just hit it straight"

But if I asked a FC if I was aiming to the left that seems to me to be a different kettle of fish.

Don't think whatever you say in reply to your FC makes a difference, it's still advice in my book.
 
Copy of e mail received today from the R & A

"Hi Bill,

Apologies, I misunderstood which examples you were talking about.

I have discussed your query below further with my colleagues and I have to admit that they are in agreement with you that this type of statement would constitute as being advice. Going back to the principles in my previous e-mail below, saying to a player, ‘you aimed too far left’, or ‘that’s where you were aiming’ is offering an opinion which could influence a player in his method of making a stroke and this would therefore be a breach of Rule 8-1.

Please accept my apologies for any inconvenience.

Kind Regards
Claire"

I referred her to this thread & she initially answered the wrong question.

This answer is in direct contradiction to the answer I got from the same person at the R & A the last time I raised exactly the same question in March, only this time she has discussed it with her (senior?) colleagues.
 
Last edited:
Copy of e mail received today from the R & A

"Hi Bill,

Apologies, I misunderstood which examples you were talking about.

I have discussed your query below further with my colleagues and I have to admit that they are in agreement with you that this type of statement would constitute as being advice. Going back to the principles in my previous e-mail below, saying to a player, ‘you aimed too far left’, or ‘that’s where you were aiming’ is offering an opinion which could influence a player in his method of making a stroke and this would therefore be a breach of Rule 8-1.

Please accept my apologies for any inconvenience.

Kind Regards
Claire"

I referred her to this thread & she initially answered the wrong question.

This answer is in direct contradiction to the answer I got from the R & A the last time I raised exactly the same question.

That bit is concerning.
 
The R&A staff who answer queries are not 'junior' staff. They have full authority to make rulings. If there anything that might be contentious, they will discuss it internally and in all probability with the USGA also.

I have one that is in just that situation at the moment.

In your case the statement was factual information. It wasn't an opinion.

As they say in pantomime "Oh yes it was!"
 
I can't imagine an authority higher than the person who wrote the rule. It's like having King John and the barons tell you what the Magna Carta means.

My snippy comment was serious, If that looks like advice to you but the R&A says it is not, that means you do not have a full grasp of what the term means.

Or whoever gave the advice didn't!

I was absolutely 100% convinced they were wrong. I firmly believe that the answer was given without proper consideration.
 
Just as an aside to this debate, I play in a lot of interclub Foxes and Seniors matches. Often the home team players will point out features of the hole and give some advice on how to play it, particularly for visiting players who have not played the course before. OK they are not qualifiers and giving this advice seems only polite, but is this in breech of rule 8-1? :confused:
 
Just as an aside to this debate, I play in a lot of interclub Foxes and Seniors matches. Often the home team players will point out features of the hole and give some advice on how to play it, particularly for visiting players who have not played the course before. OK they are not qualifiers and giving this advice seems only polite, but is this in breech of rule 8-1? :confused:

"The fairway slopes from left to right here" Fact, not advice.

"You need to hit it well over to the left here" Telling the player how to play the shot, advice.
 
Top