Another AimPoint Convert

I have to be honest i can not read greens to save my life, no matter what advice i have been given i just cant do it. Aimpoint is something i am considering having a go at. Does anybody know of any courses being run around the Hampshire area ?

Jamie Donaldson does them at Brocket Hall or Woburn. Bit of a trek I know but in my opinion well worth the effort and the cost
 
Nice one Dave hope it works for you and you're dropping putts.

How long was the course on for?

It was a 2hrs course, two course X1 and X2, there was three of us doing it, which to me is better than a solo session, as others asks questions, you may not have thought of and it's good to bounce ideas around as you go on.

Basically all the tour players that use it are rubbish with the exception of Z Johnson and Summerhays. The rest are exceptionally average to beyond awful. The fact they advertise it with Adam Scott is an embarrassment lets be honest.

On the LPGA, Stacey Lewis and LPGA World No.1 Lydia Ko uses it.

How does this work on double breakers and putts where the gradient is less/more severe near the hole?
I contacted Brian about this course late last year but decided against it in the end.

On a known double breaker you find the center of the putt take a reading there and use that number. We did it on a double breaker on Saturday and while some may think it snake oil, it worked. You could see the ball would break right then left. We stood over the ball decided which way the slope at the ball was, took a mid point reading, got our line, hit the putt accordingly and the ball went one way then the other and although none of us holed it, had it been on comp day, the next putt was a tap in.

I don't think Aimpoint is for those that cannot read greens, I think it is another tool in the box that you can use, I could read greens pretty well and like to think that my putting was above average. I did Aimpoint to confirm what I was seeing.

Put another way, let say on a the green I can see the break and would line up to what I thought the break was, but more often than not I would under read it and miss on the low side. Doing Aimpoint has shown me that even what looks like a small break can need a much wider line to avoid missing on the low side.
 
Ive used Aimpoint from it's early inception, I can read greens the normal way and have played for over 40yrs. The fact that some think it's for those who can't read greens is twaddle, and don't really know how it works or they think they do!

I wouldnt go back to normal green reading on a full time basis, have I done normal green reading since learning Aimpoint, yes, the more info I get and process the more chance of holing the putt, but I really solely rely on Aimpoint. But do I think that those who don't do Aimpoint are stupid? No, it's your choice. So why say those who do it have an inability to read greens? I could say buying these adjustable drivers are a complete waste of time, or that 90% have drivers that are 2" too long, and preach to those who have them, but each to their own.

If you think that Aimpoint gives you a better reading than the "normal" method of using your eyes, what you don't realise is that your green reading by eyesight is a lot worse than you thought.
 
If you think that Aimpoint gives you a better reading than the "normal" method of using your eyes, what you don't realise is that your green reading by eyesight is a lot worse than you thought.

There is nothing wrong with my reading greens. In fact since doing Aimpoint for the past 4 yrs I've improved my green reading skills from what I've learned through Aimpoint. I could say that whilst waiting for my turn, I can casually look at my putt whilst leaning on my putter while the all 4 compass point reader does his read I can judge the slope percentage before checking it. It's a well known fact that amateurs under read greens majority of the time, I'd rather finish 3" on the high side all day long then miss 1/4" on the low side as that will always got no chance of going in.

But I do know one thing, if we played 2 different courses with one at 8 stimp and another on 11 stimp, think I'd have a better putting day and adjusting then yourself on the 11 Stimp greens.

What at you don't realise is that I DO have best of both worlds, Aimpoint and Normal, if I choose to use it, unlike yourself.
 
There is nothing wrong with my reading greens. In fact since doing Aimpoint for the past 4 yrs I've improved my green reading skills from what I've learned through Aimpoint. I could say that whilst waiting for my turn, I can casually look at my putt whilst leaning on my putter while the all 4 compass point reader does his read I can judge the slope percentage before checking it. It's a well known fact that amateurs under read greens majority of the time, I'd rather finish 3" on the high side all day long then miss 1/4" on the low side as that will always got no chance of going in.

But I do know one thing, if we played 2 different courses with one at 8 stimp and another on 11 stimp, think I'd have a better putting day and adjusting then yourself on the 11 Stimp greens.

What at you don't realise is that I DO have best of both worlds, Aimpoint and Normal, if I choose to use it, unlike yourself.


This for me is the only problem with this discussion. I get why people use it if they feels it helps, and I can understand people getting defensive when people claim it's a crock. But, so many people pro aim point spout this line. Quite simply, if it were that simple. ALL pros would do it as they have a lot more riding in it than us.

In regards the taking time. Personally I think slow golfers will be slow no matter what technique they use.
 
There is nothing wrong with my reading greens. In fact since doing Aimpoint for the past 4 yrs I've improved my green reading skills from what I've learned through Aimpoint. I could say that whilst waiting for my turn, I can casually look at my putt whilst leaning on my putter while the all 4 compass point reader does his read I can judge the slope percentage before checking it. It's a well known fact that amateurs under read greens majority of the time, I'd rather finish 3" on the high side all day long then miss 1/4" on the low side as that will always got no chance of going in.

But I do know one thing, if we played 2 different courses with one at 8 stimp and another on 11 stimp, think I'd have a better putting day and adjusting then yourself on the 11 Stimp greens.

What at you don't realise is that I DO have best of both worlds, Aimpoint and Normal, if I choose to use it, unlike yourself.

my money is very much on Three.......
 
[/B]
This for me is the only problem with this discussion. I get why people use it if they feels it helps, and I can understand people getting defensive when people claim it's a crock. But, so many people pro aim point spout this line. Quite simply, if it were that simple. ALL pros would do it as they have a lot more riding in it than us.

In regards the taking time. Personally I think slow golfers will be slow no matter what technique they use.

But the pros play on green speeds that we would find hard to cope with, week in week out and are used to it as they play virtually the same courses year in year out. If I went to a course where it's 11, I know that I can use it to help me.
 
But the pros play on green speeds that we would find hard to cope with, week in week out and are used to it as they play virtually the same courses year in year out. If I went to a course where it's 11, I know that I can use it to help me.

So is the pace of a green the only benefit of aimpoint now? I'd imagine most good putters (which I'm not), can adjust to pace of greens relatively well. Much like players with better shirt games will adjust to certain lies they may find their ball in?
 
If you think that Aimpoint gives you a better reading than the "normal" method of using your eyes, what you don't realise is that your green reading by eyesight is a lot worse than you thought.

One of the first thing they tell you on the course is to stop judging by break by eyesight as course designers build greens to fool players visually. It's all done with the feet and is 'just a method', no one is forced to use it, it is not slow and if world class players use it then I'm very content to use it.
 
I don't use Aimpoint but I sometimes use my feet to confirm if a putt has break or not, this comes in handy on Moorland courses when the surrounding land can fool you.
Surely though reading the green with your feet is just another skill that needs practice as does reading a green the traditional way.

Am I right in saying -If you read it wrong with your feet then do everything correct via that read then you're missing the putt?
 
One of the first thing they tell you on the course is to stop judging by break by eyesight as course designers build greens to fool players visually. It's all done with the feet and is 'just a method', no one is forced to use it, it is not slow and if world class players use it then I'm very content to use it.

Exactly how many courses have you played where there is at least one hole, where you look down the line and everything is telling you the ball should break to the left, you line up, make you putt and the ball breaks to the right against everything you saw.
 
Can you detect a slope with your feet that's subtle enough move the ball! 3 inches over, say, 15 feet..?

Yes.

The differences between a 0% slope and a 5% slope are very obvious. The differences between a 0% slope and a 1% or 2% not so much, but it is surprising how you can adjust your feeling to notice the differences.

On the day, we did short (10feet and under), medium (10feet to 20feet) and long (20feet and over) and while green was not at it's best, all three of us we reading the break and getting very close on the medium and long putts, while sinking all the short ones.

It's the first comp of the season on Saturday and while I'm not expecting to go out and shoot a first ever sub 80 round, with 14 single putts, I am confident that I'll not 3 putt any hole.
 
How many people blame a bad putting stroke on the read? Aimpoint strikes me as a gimmicky way of getting around improving your stroke.
 
How many people blame a bad putting stroke on the read? Aimpoint strikes me as a gimmicky way of getting around improving your stroke.

Aimpoint will not cure a bad putting stroke, if you pull or push you puts, you'll still push or pull the regardless of your read.
 
How many people blame a bad putting stroke on the read? Aimpoint strikes me as a gimmicky way of getting around improving your stroke.

It doesn't have anything at all to do with improving your stroke, although their speed course does touch on line and tempo.
 
Top