You need to stop believing the papers, they're the only ones mentioning £100mil.
Koeman and the Club have said nothing but wanting him to stay.
We can play stats both ways, now Lukaku is weaker because he stays fit and scores goals all season rather than playing less and scoring fewer as that's a better ratio
Im not saying he will go for 100m. Believe £50/60m realistic though. But I'm just saying that the top clubs may aspire for the ones I mentioned ahead of Lukaku. If they could get them.
Im not saying that Lukaku playing more is a bad thing. But like you said about him adding goals to a team if he was there. I'd hazard a guess that during Kane's absence his replacement scored enough that Spurs main striker scored more over 38 games than Everton's. Of course that's also helped by Spurs being the better team.
Like i saod. We've had this convo before. I'd have Kane over Lukaku and going on their total prem records it's clear to me why. But if we're talking picks on the school field. Neither are bad choices.
