One Planer
Global Moderator
I'm just reading on the R&A website regarding equipment and came accross this:
With the above statement in mind should the R&A come to a decision on the use of Belly/Broom handle putters and either make the decision that:
a) Yes they are a conforming club
or
b) Unconforming and banned
Interestingley. There is another quote:
Would you associate this comment with the belly/broom handle putter (anchoring the putter)?
If so would you also apply it to 460cc drivers, balls, etc
I know people on here have varying views, some for, some against.
My opinion is that it has it gone too far now that a wide variety of tour pro's are switching to the "longer" putter. I just hope the R&A will come to some decision and put the issue to bed!
What's our opinion?
It is the role of The R&A’s Equipment Standards Committee to interpret and apply the Rules relevant to clubs and balls, and to determine and advise which conform to the Rules and which do not. The Committee is also responsible for recommending modifications to these Rules, if and when changes are believed to be necessary.
With the above statement in mind should the R&A come to a decision on the use of Belly/Broom handle putters and either make the decision that:
a) Yes they are a conforming club
or
b) Unconforming and banned
Interestingley. There is another quote:
In 1924, The R&A issued a statement which "deplored that players, instead of trying to master the use of golf clubs, should endeavour to overcome difficulties of the game by using implements which have never been associated with it
Would you associate this comment with the belly/broom handle putter (anchoring the putter)?
If so would you also apply it to 460cc drivers, balls, etc
I know people on here have varying views, some for, some against.
My opinion is that it has it gone too far now that a wide variety of tour pro's are switching to the "longer" putter. I just hope the R&A will come to some decision and put the issue to bed!
What's our opinion?