D
Deleted member 30522
Guest
10 shots under is a 2 shot reduction, 7 is 1. I'm off out so won't look for it again, but pretty sure it's further up the page?
Whs exceptional score
- Thread starter Pedromac
- Start date
D
Deleted member 30522
Guest
Pedro, so that's what's happened right? Why are you appealing?
Pedromac
New member
Because it it’s automatically applied why was I deducted a further 2 shots manually ?
wjemather
Well-known member
No, it isn't. Without looking it up again, I think the automatic reduction was 1.0 (CR is a few strokes under par, so the differential is between 7 and 10 better than CR); a further 2.0 reduction was then manually applied. A 2.0 increase that was applied earlier in the year complicates matters.
Last edited:
Pedromac
New member
nickjdavis
Head Pro
Peter has given me permission to post the following snapshot of his WHS record apologies for it being a bit small but I thought it best to include his scores to which the 2 shot upwards adjustment was applied.
rulefan
Tour Winner
I wonder why only 13 2.0s have been applied instead of to the last 20 as per 7.1a(ii)
nickjdavis
Head Pro
Its not 13 though is it.....it was 17 instances where plus 2 was added.
What looks like (and I stress that this is my interpretation only) has happened is that a 2 shot upwards adjustment was added on 20th June (round 14) and retrospectively applied to 17 scores (rounds 14-30). Then there was a 3 shot downwards adjustment applied on/after 26/9 (round 3 in the record)....this then got retrospectively applied to the previous 20 rounds (so rounds 3-22)...this 3 shot downwards adjustment has offset the plus 2 adjustment in rounds 14 through to 22 making those rounds -1.0; and rounds 3-13 have the full 3 shot downwards adjustment.
However that leaves us with the quandry of
1) why only 17 adjustments of plus two were made on 20th June
2) why did Peters round on the 26/9 get him a 3 stroke reduction?
To my mind his score differential on the 26th should have got him a 2 shot ESR....maybe the H'cap sec has then decided to add another 1 shot ESR reduction on his own accord?
What looks like (and I stress that this is my interpretation only) has happened is that a 2 shot upwards adjustment was added on 20th June (round 14) and retrospectively applied to 17 scores (rounds 14-30). Then there was a 3 shot downwards adjustment applied on/after 26/9 (round 3 in the record)....this then got retrospectively applied to the previous 20 rounds (so rounds 3-22)...this 3 shot downwards adjustment has offset the plus 2 adjustment in rounds 14 through to 22 making those rounds -1.0; and rounds 3-13 have the full 3 shot downwards adjustment.
However that leaves us with the quandry of
1) why only 17 adjustments of plus two were made on 20th June
2) why did Peters round on the 26/9 get him a 3 stroke reduction?
To my mind his score differential on the 26th should have got him a 2 shot ESR....maybe the H'cap sec has then decided to add another 1 shot ESR reduction on his own accord?
wjemather
Well-known member
It's only a 1.0 automatic ESR - the true score differential is 2.1 (-0.9 + 3.0), so 9.3 better than handicap (11.4 - 2.1); the additional manual adjustment is then 2.0 (as was advised by the handicap sec.).
D
Deleted member 30522
Guest
Thanks Nick, now we can see what's actually happened
D
Deleted member 30522
Guest
Presumably that's all the scores on his record at that time?
nickjdavis
Head Pro
Peter has well over 100 scores in his record dating back to Jan 2018
nickjdavis
Head Pro
cheers...I forgot that the -0.9 was inclusive of the 3 shot adjustment.
Swango1980
Well-known member
Has his handicap secretary / committee decided to get creative, and got themselves into a mess? If so, I wonder how many other players at the club have been impacted by adjustments to their record?
Similar threads
