who is the worst major winner?

Paul Lawrie, Since winning (or should I say been given by J V De Velde) the Open in '99, what has he done bar prop up the OOM?
........................2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
The Masters ........CUT CUT CUT T15 T37 DNP DNP DNP DNP DNP
U.S. Open ........DNP CUT T30 CUT CUT DNP DNP DNP DNP DNP
The Open Championship CUT T42 T59 CUT CUT T52 CUT CUT CUT T47
PGA Championship T72 CUT CUT DNP DNP DNP DNP DNP DNP DNP

Tournament .......2010
The Masters ........DNP
U.S. Open ........DNP
The Open Championship CUT
PGA Championship DNP
 
I think it is the other way, one major wont pay the bills forever.
Yes it would be awesome to be known as a major winner, but to be a consistent player who one day wins a major would be out of this world.
 
Andy North won three US PGA titles in his whole career, and two of them were the US Open. Not sure what my point is but thought i would be a clever Dick.
 
Just curious as to why so any have a downer on Paul Lawrie. he shot the round of the day (-4) in horrendous conditions to set the mark and had to wait a fair while for van de Velde and Justin Leonard to match it. He won a three man play off.

Shooting the lowest round on the last day of any Open is not bad going in my book.

Okay, maybe he hasn't chased the limelight like some players who have won majors since then, but, I'd say he comes across as a decent bloke and he's got his name on the greatest trophy in golf, so what does he care ?
 
i also forgot about ben curtis and paul lawrie, they were gash but tbf paul lawrie did win a few tornies
i think ben curtis won a few times in the US, and also had a couple of other top 10s in the Open - I can certainly remember him coming close a couple of times after his win.

He also played in a winning ryder cup team - not exactly a dreadful player.
 
Just curious as to why so any have a downer on Paul Lawrie. he shot the round of the day (-4) in horrendous conditions to set the mark and had to wait a fair while for van de Velde and Justin Leonard to match it. He won a three man play off.

Shooting the lowest round on the last day of any Open is not bad going in my book.

Okay, maybe he hasn't chased the limelight like some players who have won majors since then, but, I'd say he comes across as a decent bloke and he's got his name on the greatest trophy in golf, so what does he care ?
Dont get me wrong DCB, Im sure there are a lot more deserving guys out there for this title, Mr Lawrie (In my opinion, remember these are like bumholes, everyone has one!) just never seemed to get the momentum going after this win when a lot of other seemed to prosper.
I know the guy does a lot of good work and has his foundation etc, he just does not do it for me as a watchable, successful player. With regards to the Open win, he was never in front in his 72 holes, the field came back to him, partly testament to his final round but also to the inability of the other guys to close out.
 
Top