Who is going to win the premiership title.

Pin-seeker said:
I don't think any of the teams in the in the premier league are overly impressive at the minute. Chelsea obviously need a couple of strikers.City are hit & miss & have missed Aguero,not sure whats happened to Negrado. Arsenal are pants. & Liverpool are pretty much a one man team. Obviously they managed without the vile one when he was serving his ban but doubt they'd have kept it up all season.
Click to expand...

If Suarez is scum and vile what do you call players like Rameries ? Terry ? Drogba ? Robben ? Oscar ?

You don't have to look far for examples of poor behaviour within your club.
 
Doon frae Troon said:
Wimbledon !!!

As previous post, I said that I did not advocate high ball football.

Of the old teams mentioned above, did any of them do 20 'tippy tappy Ole's' or run the ball into the opponents corner flag for the last 5 minutes of the game. No.
Click to expand...

Barcelona have done the "20 tippy tappy Ole's" yet out scored most clubs around Europe in the past 5 years or so.
 
Why all the empty seats again at city? Have they become that massive going for the league is beneath them? I heard they were increasing capacity as well. No idea what for. Crazy!
 
davemc1 said:
Why all the empty seats again at city? Have they become that massive going for the league is beneath them? I heard they were increasing capacity as well. No idea what for. Crazy!
Click to expand...


Does look very bare on telly - normally their ground is full
 
BTatHome said:
A friend is a WBA fan, and he says they were wanting to charge £55 for a ticket. Hence he's now watching from home!
Click to expand...


Need to pay that massive wage bill ( biggest in sport ) somehow !!
 
Liverpoolphil said:
Need to pay that massive wage bill ( biggest in sport ) somehow !!
Click to expand...

Man city have always been a joke with tickets. Last game at main road was against saints and theyndodnt give us a proper allocation as their fans paid over odds for tickets. They've justified the £55 to WBA by classing it as a top tier game due to it's importance.
 
Doon frae Troon said:
Wimbledon !!!

As previous post, I said that I did not advocate high ball football.

Of the old teams mentioned above, did any of them do 20 'tippy tappy Ole's' or run the ball into the opponents corner flag for the last 5 minutes of the game. No.
Click to expand...

In the last 40-odd years a "long ball" team hasn't won the top league or even finished top 3 that I can think of.

By its very nature it is a system that can only progress so far, as giving away possession is a large part of it, even if the big lad wins the first ball, the rest is based on the next ball, and it is too reliant on the right bounce etc.

It will get you limited success, like promotion, mid table, even top 6-7 but not very sustainable either.

The closest team to use it were Chelsea under Mourinho, once Robben and Duff had been moved on, who despite playing fantastic football at the time, would also go very early to Drogba a good bit of the time, or as a plan B.
 
Neville and Carragher talking about their team of the season -

This is mine

Marshall

Coleman
Terry
Davies
Shaw

Gerrard
Hazard
Toure

Sterling
Suarez
Sturridge
 
Pin-seeker said:
Ok your entitled to your opinion. You take Suarez out & Liverpool would probably be battling for 4th IMO. Do you honestly think Sturridge would have had the season he's had if it wasn't for Suarez? Or sterling for that matter.
You put a top striker in the Chelsea team & the league would have been over by now.
Rodgers as done a very good job,but the competition as been poor IMO.
Click to expand...

Does it matter if Liverpool are a one man team or not, if we are champions. For the sustainable future yes, but if our name is etched on the trophy come May - not one jot. For 2012-13 does it say Man U (cos of RVP) - no.

So dont Chelsea have people who were top strikers in recent memory? Ba, Torres, Eto. maybe you should ask St.Jose why he signed Salah and William in recent transfer windows instead of Costa. Why hasn't he started with two of them strikers up front, instead of flogging the 4-2-3-1 system, why not Ba, Eto and mata in behind in some games, before moving him onto Man U. Maybe he is above criticism by Chelsea fans, despite a squad with many riches, he cant get a striker or strikers to score many goals. And thats before the off field antics that are making them even more classless.
 
Liverpoolphil said:
Neville and Carragher talking about their team of the season -

This is mine

Marshall

Coleman
Terry
Davies
Shaw

Gerrard
Hazard
Toure

Sterling
Suarez
Sturridge
Click to expand...

id swap Lallana for Sterling (only because I prefer his style of play). But other than that agree fully. And am happy to eat humble pie about sterling as in last three months he's come good.
 
Liverbirdie said:
Does it matter if Liverpool are a one man team or not, if we are champions. For the sustainable future yes, but if our name is etched on the trophy come May - not one jot. For 2012-13 does it say Man U (cos of RVP) - no.

So dont Chelsea have people who were top strikers in recent memory? Ba, Torres, Eto. maybe you should ask St.Jose why he signed Salah and William in recent transfer windows instead of Costa. Why hasn't he started with two of them strikers up front, instead of flogging the 4-2-3-1 system, why not Ba, Eto and mata in behind in some games, before moving him onto Man U. Maybe he is above criticism by Chelsea fans, despite a squad with many riches, he cant get a striker or strikers to score many goals. And thats before the off field antics that are making them even more classless.
Click to expand...
Obviously no case for the defence, then.;)
 
liverpool bet.jpg

I must have been following my heart on valentines day....I completely forgot I put this bet on! come on you red men!
 
Not sure what the odds are now on Liverpool I can't be bothered to look but Jose won't be risking any players now on Sunday much to Man Citys complaints no doubt.
 
Fish said:
Not sure what the odds are now on Liverpool I can't be bothered to look but Jose won't be risking any players now on Sunday much to Man Citys complaints no doubt.
Click to expand...

It'll be interesting to see what the fa does if he puts the reserves out. Whilst I agree that teams should be able to look after their own interests. Smaller clubs have been fined and warmed about it due to all teams having an obligation to see a fair competition for all.
 
Papas1982 said:
It'll be interesting to see what the fa does if he puts the reserves out. Whilst I agree that teams should be able to look after their own interests. Smaller clubs have been fined and warmed about it due to all teams having an obligation to see a fair competition for all.
Click to expand...

We're talking Mourinho here. He thinks he's above the law and the FA are irrelevant to him.
He thinks he has the divine right to do whatever he wants because he's Jose Mourinho!



The poison one.


Slime.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Liverbirdie
If Tommy and Jerry can do it........
Replies
12
Views
4K
Liverbirdie
Liverbirdie
Dodger
Football in general....anyone getting as bored as me??
2
Replies
29
Views
2K
Evesdad
Evesdad
CrapHacker
Ok, so you got me riled......
2 3
Replies
47
Views
3K
CrapHacker
CrapHacker
Top