D
Deleted member 18645
Guest
Reason for asking is my friend's club looks like it will have two people standing at their AGM, the incumbent who is one of the worst players in the club and apparently knows sod all about the game, and one of the club's top players who officiates for the County.
So would you rather have someone who is simply mates with those who vote or someone who would more likely get things done because of his knowledge of the game?
So would you rather have someone who is simply mates with those who vote or someone who would more likely get things done because of his knowledge of the game?