huds1475
Journeyman Pro
I'm always most alarmed by the clobber they wear to be honest
I'm always most alarmed by the clobber they wear to be honest
I'm always most alarmed by the clobber they wear to be honest
It's true. I had a 45 points and a 44 points in the same season a couple of years ago. The first one in May the second in August. Off 20 for the first and 17 for the second. Happy days!
Thinking about it, it's no different to this scenario.
not the same you were cut 3 shots in between
True but it isn't the competitors fault that it's non qualifying. I didn't get cut any shots between those two rounds either.
you said you shot one off 20 and one off 17 so you played off a lower handicap for the 2nd so you must have been cut
Yes. Sorry wasn't clear about what I meant. I was cut as a result of the 45 from 20 to 17 but not again until I shot 44.
So what I was getting at was that if the first big score had been non qualifying, it doesn't necessarily follow that I would have been playing off a lower handicap for the second big score. So my point was that it's not the competitors fault that trilby tour don't adjust handicaps. But if your criticism is of the way the trilby tour works (or at least that you think they should adjust handicaps) well that's a different point.
The point I was making is that most golfers with current handicaps when they shoot low scores in club comps they get a handicap cut and if you are reg beating your handicap in non qual comps why are these guys not also doing it in club comps
I know full well the TT is non qualifying. The guys did look like a 17 handicapper, no dispute there.
must just be coincidence that plenty who play on it consistently shoot low scores with little or no reduction in handicap.
The "Short Game Wizard" being the prime examplenot seen him in the couple Ive seen so far.
Haha! Indeed....people that do well on it year after year off a 3/4 handicap obviously just bring their A game for Skysports and William Hunt, I think it would be more likely to have the opposite effect on me...
I was initially sceptical of the chap in question that won two seperate events this year, (as my posts show above), but actually, it could have been me had I entered two events in the season where my handicap came down a lot, and I know how I would feel if it were me being judged in this thread without anyone knowing me. So I feel a bit bad that I was sceptical in the first place as it fundamentally without basis.
As always on these threads, I end up simply thinking that the Trilby Tour is what it is and I don't think it's for me. But, I still watch it when it's on and it actually looks like a pretty unique experience. I might be tempted if it were played at a some other courses, but I can understand the Marriot tie up.
The rat pack looked cool in trilby's , I can't think of anybody since them
The rat pack looked cool in trilby's , I can't think of anybody since them
The Specials and Madness.![]()
usual warning on trilby threads - please refrain from accusing any competitor of 'being a cheat' or wanton bashing of the organiser(s) otherwise the thread will be pulled and 'periods of reflection' on the sidelines will be issued
Mike, why specifically is this the case on this topic please? Some of the politics threads in out of bounds must have pure speculation and false accusation in them far less accurate than what might be said on this topic?! In another recent thread Trump is very clearly accused of being a golf cheat. Is GM partnered with or have some financial tie in with Trilby Tour.
If Mike has covered this in the past I am curious to know?
Thx