bobmac
Major Champion
How do you know if we don’t know what it was?
That statement dosnt make sense.
I'm talking about peolpe in a position of trust who rape and molest children with their bosses knowledge and getting away with it.
How do you know if we don’t know what it was?
That statement dosnt make sense.
That’s rare I would say.I'm talking about peolpe in a position of trust who rape and molest children with their bosses knowledge and getting away with it.
That’s rare I would say.
In that case I agree with you but the police can’t do anything if it’s not reported.
Their boss should get the same sentence for hiding it imo
Bob nothing would surprise me these days.But they don't, they get promoted.
And if you think its rare, I suggest you watch a film based on a true story called 'Spotlight'
The range to things that might be 'sexual' and/or 'assault' is very very wide, emotive and also subjective.
We've even had cases/reports of one guy 'brushing' against another guy. There's the recent assertion by Sturgeon that Boris Johnson was belittling her by stepping aside to allow her through a door first. An act some would alternatively define as courtesy.
There's a tendency to assume the worst and we might be wise not to condemn too quickly!
Perhaps people have got away with worse - but two wrongs never make a right. If true, he deserves what he gets.I don't have either so can't comment, but I can repeat we don't know what the assault was, but many have got away with a lot worse
There's a tendency to assume the worst and we might be wise not to condemn too quickly!
Some on here have seem to have already been judge and jury, surprised they've not asked for the death penalty back for him.
Valid point but they don’t make him drink it.If he was drunk, two questions; if he was drunk before he got on, why was he allowed on; if he became drunk on the plane, who served him the alcohol?
Valid point but they don’t make him drink it.
Every bar person in the country would be guilty for the behaviour of the punters.
Was he in this country or international airspace ?They already are; s. 141 of the Licensing Act. It might be a question Olesen's defence team will ask at trial.
Was he in this country or international airspace ?
Are the laws the same?
The normal position is that passengers are subject to the laws of the country in which the aircraft is registered once it is in flight, subject to the law of the country it is in when grounded. He was in flight on a BA flight, charged by the Met Police & is appearing in an English Magistrates court. So effectively he is in this country, regardless of where he was in the air. I believe that flight attendants have the same right to refuse service as ground bar staff.
The normal position is that passengers are subject to the laws of the country in which the aircraft is registered once it is in flight, subject to the law of the country it is in when grounded. He was in flight on a BA flight, charged by the Met Police & is appearing in an English Magistrates court. So effectively he is in this country, regardless of where he was in the air. I believe that flight attendants have the same right to refuse service as ground bar staff.
I think we are really getting into the unknown now. There are so many permutations it becomes a silly game:
1. He was drunk before he boarded.
2. He was sober before he boarded.
3. He consumed enough alcohol to be drunk before he boarded, but it hadn't yet been absorbed into the bloodstream, so he appeared sober.
Then for each of the above 3 options:
1. He didn't drink any further on the flight.
2. He was served alcohol whilst appearing drunk.
3. He was served alcohol whilst sober.
4. He was served alcohol whilst appearing sober as the alcohol from previous drinking was not yet absorbed.
5. He drank alcohol ordered by another passenger (with or without their permission, and whom appeared sober\drunk etc..)
6. He brought his own alcohol onto the plane.
7. His drink was spiked.
There are loads more possibilities, no matter how likely or unlikely. So not much point playing a guessing game, until the facts are revealed.
And this has what relevance to the post that you quoted?
The relevance is that we don't even know if the flight attendants served him alcohol or allowed him to board in an apparent state of intoxication, and so, therefore, your post and the few preceding it are going down a rabbit hole that may not even apply to the situation.
So not much point playing a guessing game, until the facts are revealed.
Too late, he's been found guilty by the media including the ET.