Are they a fire risk or safer?
Or, could the charger you already have still be used?What are the costs of the new chargers that would be required for another new battery tech? Thats my first thought.
If by miracle of miracles, yes.Or, could the charger you already have still be used?
No doubt they'll even have a different method of connectionIf by miracle of miracles, yes.
But since each battery tech has needed its own new charger for its differing way of working and charging (lead acid, nicad, lithium ion) I wouldn't be holding my breath.
No doubt they'll even have a different method of connection![]()
I was meaning the actual connection. History has shown that individual mfrs make their own decisions rather than collectively come to a joint one. Phones, electric cars. Both recent examples of a collective failure by mfrs to have a uniform connection.Surely a form of adaptor would be cheaper than an all new charger? It would also encourage people to opt for sodium over lithium if replacing
I am no expert in battery technology, but I guess much will depend on the type of battery management system required within the charger for the two different technologies.Surely a form of adaptor would be cheaper than an all new charger? It would also encourage people to opt for sodium over lithium if replacing
Surely a form of adaptor would be cheaper than an all new charger? It would also encourage people to opt for sodium over lithium if replacing
As I said I am no expertAs already said in a way.
It is about the electronics in a battery charger. They are designed to work differently
e.g. charger for a lead acid battery might look the same as one for a lithium battery however the former goes in to standby/float mode when fully charged and keeps restarting if needed, a charger for latter will (or should) switch off when the battery is fully charged.