rulefan
Tour Winner
Ah, he did the same amount of number crunching as the USGA and R&A.The same as the statistical justification for CONGU to change the the calculation.
Oops. But they didn't follow their recommendation.
Ah, he did the same amount of number crunching as the USGA and R&A.The same as the statistical justification for CONGU to change the the calculation.
What “number crunching” did the R&A do on texas scrambles when clubs didn’t send them the results ?Ah, he did the same amount of number crunching as the USGA and R&A.
Oops. But they didn't follow their recommendation.
Perhaps the USGA looked at the scores from Texas and FloridaWhat “number crunching” did the R&A do on texas scrambles when clubs didn’t send them the results ?
So how can they judge on handicap allowances from Texas Scrambles if they haven’t got any scores to use as a barometer ?Perhaps the USGA looked at the scores from Texas and Florida
But they don't need actual scores.
There are things called computers and other things called algorithms.So how can they judge on handicap allowances from Texas Scrambles if they haven’t got any scores to use as a barometer ?
...that perform statistical analysis and modelling, to produce pretty accurate results.There are things called computers and other things called algorithms.
...that perform statistical analysis and modelling, to produce pretty accurate results.
There are things called computers and other things called algorithms.
More reliable than finger in the air 10%So theoretical results then as opposed to actual real results
It wasn’t “finger in the air” it was based on our clubs results ?More reliable than finger in the air 10%
How many scrambles does your club play a year?It wasn’t “finger in the air” it was based on our clubs results ?
If it’s more then one, then too many.How many scrambles does your club play a year?
we play 4 a year and we used to be at 25% but it was changed after checking the results - no computer scenarios requiredHow many scrambles does your club play a year?
Changed to what?we play 4 a year and we used to be at 25% but it was changed after checking the results - no computer scenarios required
We changed to 15% and four drives per person on two and 10% and 3 drives on the other two and it worked fine for yearsChanged to what?
It wasn’t “finger in the air” it was based on our clubs results ?
we play 4 a year and we used to be at 25% but it was changed after checking the results - no computer scenarios required
So completely arbitrary changes until you got the "right" winners.We changed to 15% and four drives per person on two and 10% and 3 drives on the other two and it worked fine for years
Vast quantities of data were collected and analysed before and during the development of WHS, which has continued since implementation.How do you know it’s accurate if there’s no real data to compare the results of the model against?
Vast quantities of data were collected and analysed before and during the development of WHS, which has continued since implementation.
Vast quantities of data were collected and analysed before and during the development of WHS, which has continued since implementation.
What lack of record keeping, ISV's have had the capacity to record Scramble scores for year's.Not with scrambles they weren’t. There isn’t even an accepted ruleset for them before we even consider the lack of record keeping.