Foxholer
Blackballed
What the heck is it with Sports Administrators that they can't utilise technology?
HawkEye works wonderfully in Tennis! But in Cricket? http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/36490894
The Umpire got it wrong! No real problem with that - provided it hasn't too often - as the Refer process should cover these errors. They 'sent it upstairs' and it was clear that the ball would have hit the stumps, but....No! less than half the ball would have made contact, so Umpires Call! And, I believe, the fielding side lose a Referral! Absolutely stupid!
Had the Ump called it the other way and the batsman referred it, then he'd be Out! That ain't right!
Time to trust the technology - at least changing the tolerance! If they don't 'trust' the tech enough to simply accept it, then it's stupid to use 1/2 a ball as tolerance when, as in this case, the tech indicates that it was 1mm or less than 1/2 a ball deemed to be hitting the wicket - it should be 1/4 ball max if any tolerance at all is used!
If the technology is in place, then trust it!
HawkEye works wonderfully in Tennis! But in Cricket? http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/36490894
The Umpire got it wrong! No real problem with that - provided it hasn't too often - as the Refer process should cover these errors. They 'sent it upstairs' and it was clear that the ball would have hit the stumps, but....No! less than half the ball would have made contact, so Umpires Call! And, I believe, the fielding side lose a Referral! Absolutely stupid!
Had the Ump called it the other way and the batsman referred it, then he'd be Out! That ain't right!
Time to trust the technology - at least changing the tolerance! If they don't 'trust' the tech enough to simply accept it, then it's stupid to use 1/2 a ball as tolerance when, as in this case, the tech indicates that it was 1mm or less than 1/2 a ball deemed to be hitting the wicket - it should be 1/4 ball max if any tolerance at all is used!
If the technology is in place, then trust it!