Spiethgate The Open on the 13th

All within the rules and overseen by referees so no problem. However it seems to me he's gone from a shocker of a lie to a very decent one, with only a few added yards as punishment. Not really much of a disadvantage after such a dreadful tee shot!
 
All within the rules and overseen by referees so no problem. However it seems to me he's gone from a shocker of a lie to a very decent one, with only a few added yards as punishment. Not really much of a disadvantage after such a dreadful tee shir!

It's called using the rules to your advantage
 
All within the rules and overseen by referees so no problem. However it seems to me he's gone from a shocker of a lie to a very decent one, with only a few added yards as punishment. Not really much of a disadvantage after such a dreadful tee shot!

?... .. he paid for that lie with a shot.....
 
I think he meant in terms of gripping out-of-ordinary golfing drama - but I am of course open to correction.

Absolutely. I'm struggling to see how people didn't see the same. The Open leader didn't play a shot for around 20 minutes whilst an extraordinary situation unfolded. No, he did not roll his trousers up but he did make a rick of his tee shot and ended up on a practice area moving around tour buses in order to find somewhere to play his shot. A bit bemusing, dramatic and all centred around one player.

If you are looking for a literal equivalent then this is not it but there are some parallels. The good news for Speith is that unlike Jean, he went on to win.
 
Don't see the Van de Velde relevance. One made more than one error on the hole and one made a bad swing, spoke to a referee and got a ruling and used it to his advantage to minimise the damage. It's down to the R&A to decide if a range and parked tour buses should be OOB and they didn't
 
Correct Martin. Spieth hit a bad shot and then did everything right. Van de Velde was just a total nob who deserved everything he got for playing that hole that way.
 
Don't think its a massive deal but really felt for Kuchar. He probably didnt get to hit a full swing in at least half an hour and when he did on the next tee it wasnt his best. Always feel that the player that loses out in these situations isnt the one who played the bad shot to start with.
 
It seems one or two are struggling to separate the rules of golf, coupled with the impact of both events, and sets of choices made by the protagonists, Mr Van der Velde and Mr Spieth, in respect of the ultimate outcome of the championship in the relevant years under consideration.

I believe LT was referring to the 'viewing experience' rather than the rights, wrongs, whys and wherefores of the actual 'golfing' circumstances.

For clarification I would draw attention to post #32 in which LT mentions the concept of literalism in this context.

And now if you'll kindly indulge me.

*Gives up*
 
Last edited:
Top