"If" is doing a lot of heavy lifting in the leap to manipulation from a couple of abandoned rounds.He just walks off. But if you know you are only going to play 9 holes and go home. Dont enter comp. Unless the plan is to alter your handicap
The intent must be to play a complete 9 or 18 holes (unless there are holes out of play). You cannot simply choose to not play holes that are open without a valid reason.It's allowed to put in nine hole cards for handicap and a minimum of 10 holes for an 18 hole round.
How does a minimum 10 holes in an 18 hole round work then?The intent must be to play a complete 9 or 18 holes (unless there are holes out of play). You cannot simply choose to not play holes that are open without a valid reason.
Thanks for the heads up. How much popcorn will I need.I've got the ultimate "what the..." handicap manipulation story. Once dealt with, (assuming it is) I'll post it. Hysterical![]()
The committee may specify that play is over fewer than 18 holes, e.g. due to hole closure(s); or an 18 hole round may be cut short by factors outside the control of the player, e.g. injury or illness, danger, severe weather, darkness, emergency, flooding, etc.How does a minimum 10 holes in an 18 hole round work then?
It certainly highlights one of the problems that the new system has introduced.If someone hadn't put in any General Play cards from their home course for a couple of years but lots of competition ones and then, just before a match, when a great score was to drop off their record, put in a GP card, would you regard that as manipulation? It's not against any rules per se, but just feels a little "off". Would you do/say anything about it or is everything good?
NB this was not a match against me, I had nothing to do with it!
I've got the ultimate "what the..." handicap manipulation story. Once dealt with, (assuming it is) I'll post it. Hysterical![]()
They could have put in a supplementary score under UHS that, if bad, could have moved them up from, for example, 9.4 (9 shots) to 9.5 (10 shots).It certainly highlights one of the problems that the new system has introduced.
Made far easier with the current systemThey could have put in a supplementary score under UHS that, if bad, could have moved them up from, for example, 9.4 (9 shots) to 9.5 (10 shots).