Foxholer
Blackballed
The European court of human rights wants the UK Government to ban smacking a child in the home, making it illegal.
....
Er....Wrong!
Get your facts right, or you'll be sent to the Headmaster for '6 of the best'! :rofl:
The European court of human rights wants the UK Government to ban smacking a child in the home, making it illegal.
....
The trouble is, your a reasonable human being and have limits. The world or even just the country has many people who are not reasonable and do not give them self a remit.
I was caned and slipper`d at school... that's violence in my opinion.
To answer your questions directly on should it be made illegal.. I really do not know. Should we protect those children who`s parents take things too far, or educate them... Its genuinely an interesting and difficult topic.
Er....Wrong!
Get your facts right, or you'll be sent to the Headmaster for '6 of the best'! :rofl:
Cane and slipper was definitely OTT. I had it occasionally, twice, and definitely don't respect the teachers who used it when they could have reasoned with an adolescent. Oh, and on one of those occasions it wasn't even me - totally crap teacher who appeared to relish using the cane indiscriminately.
Parents who need to use physical discipline beyond the age a kid can reason sensibly need a parenting skills course, if its not too late. And to be fair, most parents wing parenting based on their own experiences growing up and a few comic manuals.
Bringing in a law for this won't work, as per persistent drink drivers. But it will fill the Care Homes with kids who've been removed from half decent parents.
I suppose it depends what the law is trying to do. No law will or does prevent any crime being committed. But since 1979 there has been a 6 fold decrease in the number of deaths by drink driving, plus it much less socially accepted. Yes of course it has not stopped the hard core drink driver, much as this proposal will not stop the hard core child beaters. But it may well make smacking/hitting a child less sociably acceptable and reduce the number of kids that are being hit. Which can not be a bad thing can it?
I suppose it depends what the law is trying to do. No law will or does prevent any crime being committed. But since 1979 there has been a 6 fold decrease in the number of deaths by drink driving, plus it much less socially accepted.
Is there a situation between two adults were one can smack the other because they were wrong or did something the other disagreed with were it is ok.
Can you point those statistics out?
When quoting decreases, stating decrease factor on these sort of stats is rarely valid - though stating percentage decrease is! Slightly different when talking about the likes of 'success rates' for things like re-offending or cancer treatments - where it's actually the marginal 'stat' that is the important one.
As with Hovis, I got the occasional smack as a child, but I've not once raised my fists in anger, never had a fight in 46yrs on this planet.
To a degree it is all semantics regarding the words violence, violent, smacking, people will spin them to however they see necessary to make their point. The point in question is whether smacking a child should be illegal, but there is more to it than that, smacking a child to shock them out of an action may be necessary, but the action of smacking must not leave a mark on the child, if it does then it becomes a violent act.
Leaving you handprint on a child's leg is wrong, a parent that does that needs to take a look in the mirror, that is abuse.
The purpose of smacking a child is not to harm or maim, leave a mark, but to protect, to induce a shock that breaks a repeated pattern, to stop them from doing something that may harm them if they continued.
Legally or morally?
Either and remember it's to be done in such a way to stun or shock the other into compliance
What do you think would be the better outcome of this.
You get caught steeling a car in the UK . You get caught and punished in the way of an afternoon in prison plus court fee's.
You move to spain and the police catch you steeling a car. They dont arrest you they just kick the living daylights out of you. In what country would you re offend in??
I'd go to prison every day. When you go to spain you don't mess with the "powlice" because them crazy buggers mean business.
Are any of those examples actual facts or just exaggerations based on hearsay to back up a point of view?
A few years back bbc followed a group of ex offenders to see how they dealt with rehabilitation. This guy moved to spain and said "i cant brake the law here because they'll kill me before they'll fill in the paper work"
Funny story and at the extreme end but what i got from that is, if the consequences out weigh the action then most people think twice