bobmac
Major Champion
I agree.Putting people into pigeon holes and suggesting when they should play is wrong.
Ok, you say my idea won't work....what's your idea?
Last edited:
I agree.Putting people into pigeon holes and suggesting when they should play is wrong.
We'd probably just do it. Finished by 10:30 and my course to Woodhall Spa is 1hr 30mins by car.I'd prefer 8.00.
I've got to be home by 12
If we're playing at Woodhall I'll have to charge my car up first, that will take 3 daysWe'd probably just do it. Finished by 10:30 and my course to Woodhall Spa is 1hr 30mins by car.
I have done 2hrs 25mins as a two ball in matchplay in recent years.
But if we make a special effort we might be quicker.
4pm that’s when I finish work!Very close.
I was hoping for a few answers to my question in post no. 57.....
I agree.
Ok, you say my idea won't work....what's your idea?
The problem is these ideas have been tried for years and haven't worked. I did think 'ready golf' might help but sadly, it appears not and rounds just seem to get longer.Minimum 10 minute tee times.
Repeated education that slower groups must let the group behind play through they have lost more than 12-15 minutes on the group ahead.
Backed by regular, consistent, firm marshalling insisting that groups who have lost ground stand aside to let groups behind through.
If necessary, sanctions for those repeatedly not abiding by the set protocol.
I disagree, where these principles have been consistently applied over time there has been great success. Rounds may have got longer elsewhere but of course almost all clubs don’t do the above correctly.The problem is these ideas have been tried for years and haven't worked. I did think 'ready golf' might help but sadly, it appears not and rounds just seem to get longer.
So why not try something different that lets slow players play slowly and fast players play quickly?I disagree, where these principles have been consistently applied over time there has been great success. Rounds may have got longer elsewhere but of course almost all clubs don’t do the above correctly.
How would you define the problem exactly ?I agree.
Ok, you say my idea won't work....what's your idea?
People who want to be able to play their second shot when they reach their tee shot but can't because there is a slower group in front holding them up.How would you define the problem exactly ?
What I actually said was your idea is good, but would not work for the reasons I’ve stated, ie, self policing wouldn’t work, people inflexible, very few (if any) recognise themselves as slow players.I agree.
Ok, you say my idea won't work....what's your idea?
I agree.
Ok, you say my idea won't work....what's your idea?
Ok, so my good idea wont work.What I actually said was your idea is good, but would not work for the reasons I’ve stated, ie, self policing wouldn’t work, people inflexible, very few (if any) recognise themselves as slow players.
Slow play is very dificult to define.
My proposal does exactly that.So why not try something different that lets slow players play slowly and fast players play quickly?
See post #145Ok, so my good idea wont work.
What would you suggest instead?
This doesn’t make sense for most Par 4’s the group in front could be on and around the green, surely you wouldn’t expect them to go any quicker?People who want to be able to play their second shot when they reach their tee shot but can't because there is a slower group in front holding them up.
Telling the fast players to slow down or the slow players to speed up is not going to work.
What a pointless thread. People who cannot agree, nothing unusual there. 2 sides entrenched with their own idea and are not prepared to change views. I expect the original poster did not expect over 150 replies.
Happy Easter everybody. I have a round booked @1p.m. 4 ball, couple of beers and will be home for the start of the football
Is that for the 3pm kick off, the 5pm or the 8pm match?What a pointless thread. People who cannot agree, nothing unusual there. 2 sides entrenched with their own idea and are not prepared to change views. I expect the original poster did not expect over 150 replies.
Happy Easter everybody. I have a round booked @1p.m. 4 ball, couple of beers and will be home for the start of the football
Not aware there was a game on Sky @5 p.m. However 5.30 and there is nobody in front of us as there was a scramble today and we have the first bookable tee.Is that for the 3pm kick off, the 5pm or the 8pm match?
Getting to the ball when it’s your turn to play? Or just getting to the ball?
The point is, given the choice, I agree with you, I think most players would rather be in front of a slow group than behind them.
I also think the same could be said for slow groups, they'd rather be behind faster players so not pushed all the way round. (see post 109)
So sprinters out first, slower players out towards the end.
If, for any reason, a slow player needs to go out early then fine but they are probably not going to enjoy their game. The same goes for sprinters going out last.
It may take a few comps but I think everyone would work out which group they enjoy the most without being told when they can and can't play.