• We'd like to take this opportunity to wish you a Happy Holidays and a very Merry Christmas from all at Golf Monthly. Thank you for sharing your 2025 with us!

Simon Dyson hearing

Knowing they are breaking the rules is the difference.
But Dyson didn't realise what he was doing until it was pointed out to him

The same as McIlroy

When it was pointed out to both they realised they had both broke the rules.
 
But Dyson didn't realise what he was doing until it was pointed out to him

The same as McIlroy

When it was pointed out to both they realised they had both broke the rules.
But the European tour governing body said he acted deliberately with full knowledge. So now dysons a liar?
 
I suspect Ian Mill QC thinks he did. Hence the decision.

I prefer to believe the golfer.

There is no different between the incidents

If you are calling Dyson a cheat for breaking a rule then it applies to both Woods and McIlory

They both did deliberate acts that broke a rule they knew existed and did it to gain an advantage
 
But the European tour governing body said he acted deliberately with full knowledge. So now dysons a liar?


the fact, as the Panel found, that Mr Dyson’s conduct on the occasion in question involved a momentary aberration on his part, not a premeditated act of cheating
 
Sorry, let me rephrase.
"Has anyone decided whether Monty is a rule breaker yet for improving his lie in a bunker after a long rain delay?";)

I believe he broke the rules then and also in Indonesia with the immovable object
 
Top