SocketRocket
Ryder Cup Winner
Maybe or maybe what I said.Or receiving the bucket-loads of negative mail/email from constituents about it!
Maybe or maybe what I said.Or receiving the bucket-loads of negative mail/email from constituents about it!
Ignoring? If you want my opinion on it post a link and I'll decide if I find it worthy of commenting on.Still ignoring Jenrick then?
Ha, Ha, so yesterday it was mentioned, discussed at length on here when it happened and you are still in denial! Brilliant, you couldn’t make it up.Ignoring? If you want my opinion on it post a link and I'll decide if I find it worthy of commenting on.
Depends if you Want to believe it.https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/...-wales-police-labour-mp-twitter-a4401186.html
OK, here it is again. Doesnt seem like the Police agreed with the necessary supplies. Does anyone honestly believe Neil Kinnock needs his son to deliver supplies to him. Really!
I think there have been plenty from the “everyone else” side that have flouted the rules too.It’s pretty obvious that it’s one rule for them & another for everyone else. it’s always the same,I’m alright jack.
I have told you before, I dont read all the posts on here, it's not compulsary. I will take a look at it and let you know my feeling on the matter as you appear to want my feedback.Ha, Ha, so yesterday it was mentioned, discussed at length on here when it happened and you are still in denial! Brilliant, you couldn’t make it up.
Robert Jenrick
The Housing, Communities and Local Government Secretary was forced to explain himself after travelling more than an hour to visit his parents despite warning people to remain at home.
Mr Jenrick was also criticised for travelling 150 miles from his London property to his Herefordshire home from where he travelled to his parents in Shropshire.
However, he defended his actions, saying he went to deliver food and medicine to his isolating parents.
What insult? I haven’t insulted you!I have told you before, I dont read all the posts on here, it's not compulsary. I will take a look at it and let you know my feeling on the matter as you appear to want my feedback.
Is there really any need for the insults.
Just think a minute what would be the reaction if you said the attached to someone you dont know in a conservation, or if they said it to you. I'm not thinned skinned but its inflamitory language and many would consider it an insult. Im trying to stop getting into conversations with you that are set to escalate and result in warnings from Mods. Weve both been asked to stop it so let's make an effort please.What insult? I haven’t insulted you!
And you decide to quote it ???
??
I’d laugh and tell them to stick it were the sun don’t shine, but certainly not insulted. There was no intention to insult you, the reaction was sheer disbelief in your answer to me.Just think a minute what would be the reaction if you said the attached to someone you dont know in a conservation, or if they said it to you. I'm not thinned skinned but its inflamitory language and many would consider it an insult. Im trying to stop getting into conversations with you that are set to escalate and result in warnings from Mods. Weve both been asked to stop it so let's make an effort please.
"Ha, Ha, so yesterday it was mentioned, discussed at length on here when it happened and you are still in denial! Brilliant, you couldn’t make it up ?"
I repeat, I will not get drawn into threads with you that escalate into warnings, it's happened too often.I’d laugh and tell them to stick it were the sun don’t shine, but certainly not insulted. There was no intention to insult you, the reaction was sheer disbelief in your answer to me.
You constantly post sarcastic comments, are you saying you are actually insulting someone everytime you do.
Have you researched Jenrick yet?
Well rest assured I wasn’t trying to draw you in to anything, you come across as an intelligent person who tends to follow politics and keeps up to date, therefore I am still bewildered at your lack of knowledge about Jenrick and await your response with anticipation and a pinch of suspense.I repeat, I will not get drawn into threads with you that escalate into warnings, it's happened too often.
I will reply to your question when I have a little more time. I dont have a lot of time this evening.
Jenrick's 'breach' holds up as legit imo - providing his reason/excuse was true....
Have you researched Jenrick yet?
Behave, none of them 400 are at the top end of Government and responsible for policies and decisions affecting the whole Country.So a guy who in a state of panic travels with his family to protect his child in a worst case scenario. The media have hated him from day one so drum a hysteria against him dragging along the public and we all want him sacked for his mistake In which he thinks he did the right thing. Never went near anyone so minimal risk.
so did we get the 400 Plus people’s names and job sat on the beaches yesterday deliberately flouting rules knowingly, with a major risk to public health, so we can demand they are all sacked too. Or is it one rule for him and one rule for the masses ?
Behave, none of them 400 are at the top end of Government and responsible for policies and decisions affecting the whole Country.
I no longer think he should be sacked for his trip to Durham as I accept his reasons even if I don’t agree with them.
Life is not fair and people in positions of responsibility are held to a higher standard whether we like it or not.