Leftie
Tour Winner
Guy I regularly play with is a bandit of his official H/Cap of 7 but doesn't perform as well with a card in his hand. Not a deliberate ploy, just (I assume) the added pressure of a medal round. We have on occasions put in supplementaries for him whether he liked it or not and he has been cut, only to gradually rise again through comps.
We played today at an "away" course (Knole Park) and he shot a net 67 off the whites with a SSS of 70, and intends to put the card in for H/cap reduction. H/cap should come down to 6.
The problem is that the card will not be received and processed before he plays in a comp on Sunday.
Should he ....
A) put his card into the box asap and play off 6 in the comp?
B) ditto but play off 7 in the comp?
C) Play off 7 in the comp and put the card in later?
He is adamant that he has had this situation some years ago and was given a ruling that he is right in playing off 7 on Sunday if the card has not been received and processed by the H/cap secretary.
I disagree and think that he should cut himself regardless of whether the card has been processed or not.
Who is right please?
I can understand his view if it involved being cut to 5 as County would need to be involved. Is he getting confused with this or am I totally wrong.
We played today at an "away" course (Knole Park) and he shot a net 67 off the whites with a SSS of 70, and intends to put the card in for H/cap reduction. H/cap should come down to 6.
The problem is that the card will not be received and processed before he plays in a comp on Sunday.
Should he ....
A) put his card into the box asap and play off 6 in the comp?
B) ditto but play off 7 in the comp?
C) Play off 7 in the comp and put the card in later?
He is adamant that he has had this situation some years ago and was given a ruling that he is right in playing off 7 on Sunday if the card has not been received and processed by the H/cap secretary.
I disagree and think that he should cut himself regardless of whether the card has been processed or not.
Who is right please?
I can understand his view if it involved being cut to 5 as County would need to be involved. Is he getting confused with this or am I totally wrong.