Some people need to check their Settings - I'm only on page 16..👍
At the time of writing, I am also on page 46. Probably depends on your settings and which browser you use.
Sorry - page 47 now!
Last edited:
Some people need to check their Settings - I'm only on page 16..👍
Myself, Val and a few others have said much the same as Phil on this topic, and it hasn't generated any vitriol aimed at us.
I think that shows just how many people on this forum play the man and not the ball.
But assuming that a person knows the drug they are taking is 'borderline' to put it politely, then do you not think that someone who is apparently scrupulous in their business dealings and obsessive on every detail, would take 10 seconds to read an email that may well make what they are knowingly taking illegal?
I'd buy that argument more if they were taking that drug for the first time and the last time they looked it was OK, but am struggling to see that scenario if someone has been taking it for 10 years.
Myself, Val and a few others have said much the same as Phil on this topic, and it hasn't generated any vitriol aimed at us.
I think that shows just how many people on this forum play the man and not the ball.
But I think she is saying that she wasn't aware the drug was 'borderline' and it was a monumental balls up by not fully reading the email on 22 Dec. Big businesses even bigger than Sharapova Inc. have a history of making monumental balls up and not overseeing what they should have eg Baring Bros not keeping a watchful eye over Leeson
So in summary until proven otherwise I buy her story that she ballsed up
But I think she is saying that she wasn't aware the drug was 'borderline' and it was a monumental balls up by not fully reading the email on 22 Dec. Big businesses even bigger than Sharapova Inc. have a history of making monumental balls up and not overseeing what they should have eg Baring Bros not keeping a watchful eye over Leeson
So in summary until proven otherwise I buy her story that she ballsed up
& why do you think that is?
Probably the same reason most people gang up on someone - it's easy and gives them a cheap thrill.
That aside, you are still wrong! :lol:
Well, then, you lot are also wrong and either hopelessly naive and uninformed or just stirring the pot too.
At this moment in time it is only old Sharapova that knows the answer to that.
I just checked the internet and there is a site where you can show solidarity and get T shirts made:
Je Suis Liverproof Phil - égalité, fraternité, naïveté
Given that she's admitted the offence? Her explanation is no different from telling the policeman you were speeding because you were late for work - you were still speeding!
But I think she is saying that she wasn't aware the drug was 'borderline' and it was a monumental balls up by not fully reading the email on 22 Dec. Big businesses even bigger than Sharapova Inc. have a history of making monumental balls up and not overseeing what they should have eg Baring Bros not keeping a watchful eye over Leeson
So in summary until proven otherwise I buy her story that she ballsed up
Myself, Val and a few others have said much the same as Phil on this topic, and it hasn't generated any vitriol aimed at us.
I think that shows just how many people on this forum play the man and not the ball.
Well, then, you lot are also wrong and either hopelessly naive and uninformed or just stirring the pot too.
Lots of folk clinging to the 22nd Dec notification thing as a get out of jail card for her actions
But the guy who ran WADA for 8 years said:
"Anytime there is a change to the list, notice is given on 30 September prior to the change," he said.
"You have October, November, December to get off what you are doing"
"All the tennis players were given notification of it"
The Dec notification was more like a final reminder for her
Here's my summary:
So it goes on a watch list for a year, that's like saying, we think what your taking is dodgy and we're gonna check
Sept notification: we checked, its well dodgy, stop it
Dec notification, last warning, we know you were at it, pack it in, we'll check
Jan 2016: would you pee in this cup please?
March: I'd like to thank my fans for their support
Lots of folk clinging to the 22nd Dec notification thing as a get out of jail card for her actions
But the guy who ran WADA for 8 years said:
"Anytime there is a change to the list, notice is given on 30 September prior to the change," he said.
"You have October, November, December to get off what you are doing"
"All the tennis players were given notification of it"
The Dec notification was more like a final reminder for her
Here's my summary:
So it goes on a watch list for a year, that's like saying, we think what your taking is dodgy and we're gonna check
Sept notification: we checked, its well dodgy, stop it
Dec notification, last warning, we know you were at it, pack it in, we'll check
Jan 2016: would you pee in this cup please?
March: I'd like to thank my fans for their support
Lots of folk clinging to the 22nd Dec notification thing as a get out of jail card for her actions
But the guy who ran WADA for 8 years said:
"Anytime there is a change to the list, notice is given on 30 September prior to the change," he said.
"You have October, November, December to get off what you are doing"
"All the tennis players were given notification of it"
The Dec notification was more like a final reminder for her
Here's my summary:
So it goes on a watch list for a year, that's like saying, we think what your taking is dodgy and we're gonna check
Sept notification: we checked, its well dodgy, stop it
Dec notification, last warning, we know you were at it, pack it in, we'll check
Jan 2016: would you pee in this cup please?
March: I'd like to thank my fans for their support