Grant85
Head Pro
So when the rest of the field raises the issue, what then?
They let them play, they finish 1, 2 & 3 having broken the rules. Do you seriously think the bloke finishing 4th, looking at the pot of $1.5 million & a 2 year exemption, is going to stand there & applaud or highlight the breach?
The real reason they won't disqualify them is the the Tour will take them to one side, read them their fortune and they'll all trot along to the first tee in long trousers like good little boys. If they're going to wear shorts it will be by negotiation, not demonstration.
40 years ago, I'd say quite a few of the pros would take that view and there might be plenty said about it. But most people were still struggling to make a living back then so would definitely be motivated by money, these days everyone's a millionaire and doesn't want to be seen as being a bad loser or getting into a dispute that might upset fans or sponsors, or potential sponsors.
How many other pros were massively outspoken about Patrick Reed shifting the sand in the Bahamas?
There were a few mutterings from Koepka, but in actual fact very little was said despite the fact Reed won well over $1 million in that week and the next tournament he played (when many might have expected he'd be suspended).