Scotland Debate

stevie_r

Tour Winner
Joined
May 1, 2011
Messages
3,199
Visit site
First you should ignore IMO the finger-in-the-air consultants initial £40m estimate that would have resulted in a ten storey Cold War days East European office block. There was a very significant overspend - but the overspend was justified by those seeking a significant and lasting architectural statement. And that is what Scotland has got. I don't know how much it is costing each and everyone these days - but one a week-by-week basis I'm guessing that the cost overspend is not that significant an impact on the individual. And it's there now and can't be un-there'd

And note that the Scottish parliament building isn't the only iconic or statement building that has been subject to massive overspend. Try Sydney Opera House for one.

Did we pay for the Sydney Opera house? didn't know that.
 

SwingsitlikeHogan

Major Champion
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
33,322
Visit site
All I am saying is that it is not unusual for significant and 'statement' building projects to go well over budget. Besides - it is built. You can either accept that the budget for it was significantly overspent or let it bug you. I don't expect there to be too many public building projects happening in the near future on the scale or importance of the Holyrood parliament buildings. I blame the politicians who let it happen.

I'm not sure of the business case for the Edinburgh tram system - and as I understand it - certainly unsure that one could be made for what has now been built.
 

stevie_r

Tour Winner
Joined
May 1, 2011
Messages
3,199
Visit site
All I am saying is that it is not unusual for significant and 'statement' building projects to go well over budget. Besides - it is built. You can either accept that the budget for it was significantly overspent or let it bug you. I don't expect there to be too many public building projects happening in the near future on the scale or importance of the Holyrood parliament buildings. I blame the politicians who let it happen.

I'm not sure of the business case for the Edinburgh tram system - and as I understand it - certainly unsure that one could be made for what has now been built.

The very simple facts of the matter are that it was a scandalously mis-managed project. To open 3 years late is bad enough; to cost over 10 times the initial estimate shows criminal levels of inefficiency.
It looks crap, a 60s Eastern Block style building would have done the job; it's a parliament building, the important bit is what happens inside, not how it looks as a tourist photo backdrop.
 

Foxholer

Blackballed
Joined
Nov 16, 2011
Messages
24,160
Visit site
If we're going to discuss obscene over spend by govt it's only fair to bring Olympics,refurb of Westminster or channel tunnel into the equation....

Olympic overspend? Surely not! :D That supposedly came in 'under budget'! :rofl: It did make a 'profit' though!

The scariest thing about the Scottish Parliament was that way MSPs actually voted to simply remove the £195M cap - effectively saying 'build it, irrespective of the cost'!

@Stevie_R As SILH posted, the £40M was finger in the air stuff. First 'official' budget was £109M - still huge and only 25% of the final amount.

It does cost something approaching 500k/year to clean the building and windows too!
 
Last edited:

SwingsitlikeHogan

Major Champion
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
33,322
Visit site
The scariest thing about the Scottish Parliament was that way MSPs actually voted to simply remove the £195M cap - effectively saying 'build it, irrespective of the cost'!

I agree with that sentiment fully. But it's built - and whether you like it or not is simply opinion. I guess not many on here will like 'brutalist' and 'modernist' architecture - as it happens I do like a lot of what many would have pulled down - though opinion is moving towards keeping it these days (see Preston Bus Station as a recent example 'saved' from demolition).

It is not so long ago that anything Victorian/Gothic looking was detested and hauled down whenever possible - the most scandalous in Glasgow IMO being the YMCA building in Bothwell Street and St Enoch Station and Hotel (for the UK MoD move which was never going to happen).

Maybe a new Scottish modern vernacular style will emerge in the coming decades that doesn't mimic crow-stepped gables and fortified tower houses.
 
Last edited:

lex!

Challenge Tour Pro
Joined
Nov 27, 2013
Messages
565
Visit site
OK, spent far too much money on it but it's a great looking building IMO. Very eye catching, I really admire it when I go past. Big draw for Edinburgh tourists too.
 

Foxholer

Blackballed
Joined
Nov 16, 2011
Messages
24,160
Visit site
I agree with that sentiment fully. But it's built - and whether you like it or not is simply opinion.

It's nothing to do with the architecture! I'm neutral on that - some good, some not so good imo. It's the irresponsibility I object to - in the same way as I did with the original Millenium Dome plan - £600M to build (plus £200M overrun), then pull down 1 year later!

There's a desk (for 6) in Holyrood that cost 88k! What?!

Puzzling... All the massive overspends on government I.T. projects seem to have [conveniently] not been mentioned... All of you 'work' in I.T.?

Yep. Those are the biggest of the lot! And far less visible!

The NHS (existing past and future) ones being right up there as the worst examples! Though there are plenty of others too!

Anyway....Back to the proper use of the building - for Governing Scotland, devolved or independently!
 
Last edited:

stevie_r

Tour Winner
Joined
May 1, 2011
Messages
3,199
Visit site
Olympic overspend? Surely not! :D That supposedly came in 'under budget'! :rofl: It did make a 'profit' though!

The scariest thing about the Scottish Parliament was that way MSPs actually voted to simply remove the £195M cap - effectively saying 'build it, irrespective of the cost'!

@Stevie_R As SILH posted, the £40M was finger in the air stuff. First 'official' budget was £109M - still huge and only 25% of the final amount.

It does cost something approaching 500k/year to clean the building and windows too!

Well that's ok then.

It still looks hideous. Tourist attraction? not really, people travelling from overseas might give it a quick look but I doubt it serves to attract anyone to travel to Edinburgh. I would be amazed if it has had any affect of tourism figures at all.
 

FairwayDodger

Money List Winner
Joined
Dec 11, 2011
Messages
9,622
Location
Edinburgh
Visit site
Well that's ok then.

It still looks hideous. Tourist attraction? not really, people travelling from overseas might give it a quick look but I doubt it serves to attract anyone to travel to Edinburgh. I would be amazed if it has had any affect of tourism figures at all.

It is certainly always hoaching with tourists around there although I suspect Holyrood (across the road) is the bigger draw.
 

SwingsitlikeHogan

Major Champion
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
33,322
Visit site
Puzzling... All the massive overspends on government I.T. projects seem to have [conveniently] not been mentioned... All of you 'work' in I.T.?

The problem with government IT projects is more often that not due to moving goalposts. The suppler signs up to deliver one thing but the process takes so long that by the time they get going the requirements change and so cost start escalating - and so on it goes with a government or departmental expert appearing out of every nook and cranny proclaiming to be a key stakeholder and to be consulted - and so it goes on.

Some IT projects work pretty well though. Government Gateway for one - on 30/31st January of each year it is - with the HMRC Tax SA website - one of the most heavily used transactions websites in the world - and tends to keep going under the strain.
 
Last edited:

Adi2Dassler

Journeyman Pro
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
1,868
Visit site
The Scottish parliament building is a solid bit of kit (except for those pesky leaking window seat thingmys) and I suppose beauty is in the eye of the beholder.I'd have gone for a refit of Donaldsons in the west end and kept the Royal High on Calton hill as the second chamber of any bicameral govt.

Donaldsons has to be the nicest building in all of Edinburgh
 
Top