USER1999
Grand Slam Winner
If we're going to discuss obscene over spend by govt it's only fair to bring Olympics,refurb of Westminster or channel tunnel into the equation....
What about the dome?
If we're going to discuss obscene over spend by govt it's only fair to bring Olympics,refurb of Westminster or channel tunnel into the equation....
What about the dome?
First you should ignore IMO the finger-in-the-air consultants initial £40m estimate that would have resulted in a ten storey Cold War days East European office block. There was a very significant overspend - but the overspend was justified by those seeking a significant and lasting architectural statement. And that is what Scotland has got. I don't know how much it is costing each and everyone these days - but one a week-by-week basis I'm guessing that the cost overspend is not that significant an impact on the individual. And it's there now and can't be un-there'd
And note that the Scottish parliament building isn't the only iconic or statement building that has been subject to massive overspend. Try Sydney Opera House for one.
All I am saying is that it is not unusual for significant and 'statement' building projects to go well over budget. Besides - it is built. You can either accept that the budget for it was significantly overspent or let it bug you. I don't expect there to be too many public building projects happening in the near future on the scale or importance of the Holyrood parliament buildings. I blame the politicians who let it happen.
I'm not sure of the business case for the Edinburgh tram system - and as I understand it - certainly unsure that one could be made for what has now been built.
If we're going to discuss obscene over spend by govt it's only fair to bring Olympics,refurb of Westminster or channel tunnel into the equation....
The scariest thing about the Scottish Parliament was that way MSPs actually voted to simply remove the £195M cap - effectively saying 'build it, irrespective of the cost'!
I agree with that sentiment fully. But it's built - and whether you like it or not is simply opinion.
Puzzling... All the massive overspends on government I.T. projects seem to have [conveniently] not been mentioned... All of you 'work' in I.T.?
Anyway....Back to the proper use of the building - for Governing Scotland, devolved or independently!
Olympic overspend? Surely not! That supposedly came in 'under budget'! :rofl: It did make a 'profit' though!
The scariest thing about the Scottish Parliament was that way MSPs actually voted to simply remove the £195M cap - effectively saying 'build it, irrespective of the cost'!
@Stevie_R As SILH posted, the £40M was finger in the air stuff. First 'official' budget was £109M - still huge and only 25% of the final amount.
It does cost something approaching 500k/year to clean the building and windows too!
Well that's ok then.
It still looks hideous. Tourist attraction? not really, people travelling from overseas might give it a quick look but I doubt it serves to attract anyone to travel to Edinburgh. I would be amazed if it has had any affect of tourism figures at all.
Puzzling... All the massive overspends on government I.T. projects seem to have [conveniently] not been mentioned... All of you 'work' in I.T.?
Donaldsons has to be the nicest building in all of Edinburgh
For me, it has to be Fettes College
(where tony blair learnt how to be a socialist)