IanMcC
Well-known member
Is there any instance now where you need (or are advised) to use the club you intend to swing with when taking relief, or is it always longest club in the bag, except putter?
For measuring?Is there any instance now where you need (or are advised) to use the club you intend to swing with when taking relief, or is it always longest club in the bag, except putter?
Is there any instance now where you need (or are advised) to use the club you intend to swing with when taking relief, or is it always longest club in the bag, except putter?
That was my belief, but someone at my club insisted that the measuring is done with the club you intend to use also. I was 90% sure he was wrong, but just wanted confirmation.I always thought you determined relief with the club you're going to use and measure relief with any club - but its a almost always the driver..
That was my belief, but someone at my club insisted that the measuring is done with the club you intend to use also. I was 90% sure he was wrong, but just wanted confirmation.
I believe Traminator meanthttps://www.randa.org/en/rog/2019/rules/the-rules-of-golf/rule-17#17-1d I believe you’ll find it’s the longest club in the bag excluding putter.
That was my belief, but someone at my club insisted that the measuring is done with the club you intend to use also. I was 90% sure he was wrong, but just wanted confirmation.
If anyone tells you any rule that you think is wrong, give them a rule book (if one is handy) and ask them to show you the ruling.
If anyone tells you any rule that you think is wrong, give them a rule book (if one is handy) and ask them to show you the ruling.
In this instance, your mate was partly right.
The club you intend to use is used to establish the nearest point of relief.
Then you switch to the driver to measure the one clublength.
Wrong way round.
Why should someone have to disprove misinformation that doesn't exist?
I know that I can always measure with my driver, if someone suddenly said I must use my 7 iron and I know that's BS, what am I supposed to go looking for? It's up to him to look surely?
And they might learn something while they are looking.Wrong way round.
Why should someone have to disprove misinformation that doesn't exist?
I know that I can always measure with my driver, if someone suddenly said I must use my 7 iron and I know that's BS, what am I supposed to go looking for? It's up to him to look surely?
the advice itself is flawed)
If someone tries to pull me up on a rule and I know he is wrong, he has the burden of proof as he is the one making the claim.
What would you say if someone told you you were only allowed to carry 13 clubs and tried to penalise you?
In the specific scenario in this thread, it is 100% up to the person challenging.You're right in that scenario of course.... But that's not what happened here is it?
You've changed it from 'think they're wrong ' to 'know they're wrong'
Both believed they were right but the OP didn't have the kind of certainty required for your advice... or he wouldn't have needed to post it here, would he?
Your advice is sound only when a player has 100% certainty otherwise the 'I'll teach him' purpose of handing him a rule book can easily backfire
In the specific scenario in this thread, it is 100% up to the person challenging.
It is KNOWN that the driver is used for measuring, but the player challenging said there is an extra rule.
It is not for the player who disagrees to thumb through the book trying to find something that doesn't exist, it is for the challenger to try and find it.
In another scenario, last year I hit my ball in a narrow lateral ditch, and when I dropped back in line with the pin I was on the other side of the ditch.
My opponent said "you can't drop on the other side" (he was confusing the fact that the 2 club lengths on the opposite margin has been withdrawn unless under local/tournament rule). In that situation I got the book out and showed him the diagram with the options written in black and white.
The only thing "petulant" is the actions and way of thinking you describe. If you say there's an extra rule and someone says "prove it", it would be very childish to not bother looking just to prove some point.So why do we not give advice to suggest both players get round the rule book like a couple of adults to resolve the mistake rather than the obvious petulant action of handing over rule books with a 'show me' / 'I'll teach him' attitude?
If someone handed me a rule book with that quote I'd be inclined to concede the point even if I was right.
He might even deserve his 'lesson' but that hardly means I need to lower myself to behave in that manner
We need to remember the OP was not 100% certain
If someone tries to pull me up on a rule and I know he is wrong, he has the burden of proof as he is the one making the claim.
What would you say if someone told you you were only allowed to carry 13 clubs and tried to penalise you?