sev112
Tour Winner
i think you are being harsh on teh OP - he said, please tell me why you think it is valid, which is very different to saying he fundamentally disagrees.
I think it is a fair question to which those wholeheartedly supporting it shoudl say why you support it . The reasons may be perfectly valid and highly appropriate. But the replies to date have failed to do so, which is quite interesting.
By the way, i am generally in support of it as a principle, for those that have served in action. I would not support it for non-active service, but i would also support "active" (however you define that i dont know) police, fire, ambulance etc, and would certainly include nurses, and possibly secondary school teachers
What really gets my goat however is age based fees - i.e the up to 29 years old lot who get their membership for 30% !!!!!????? And they are all IT gurus who get padi loads more than me

I think it is a fair question to which those wholeheartedly supporting it shoudl say why you support it . The reasons may be perfectly valid and highly appropriate. But the replies to date have failed to do so, which is quite interesting.
By the way, i am generally in support of it as a principle, for those that have served in action. I would not support it for non-active service, but i would also support "active" (however you define that i dont know) police, fire, ambulance etc, and would certainly include nurses, and possibly secondary school teachers
What really gets my goat however is age based fees - i.e the up to 29 years old lot who get their membership for 30% !!!!!????? And they are all IT gurus who get padi loads more than me