VVega
Assistant Pro
Is that the case? Thought it falls under abnormal ground and in fact it’s wider defined now as “an animal hole”?a bit of a ” know all” and looked shocked when I told him there is no such thing now as relief from rabbit scraping.
Is that the case? Thought it falls under abnormal ground and in fact it’s wider defined now as “an animal hole”?a bit of a ” know all” and looked shocked when I told him there is no such thing now as relief from rabbit scraping.
That’s what I thought, hence was puzzled to read the quote in my OP.You may take relief from interference by an animal hole expect in a penalty area. It no longer needs to be a burrowing animal. My zoological understanding is a rabbit is an animal and so, yes, what you say is the case. The Definition of Abnormal Course Condition includes an animal hole as one of the four defined conditions.
https://www.randa.org/rog/definitions#definition-A
When does a scrape become a hole?
I agree with Jim. If a 'scrape' by an animal has broken the surface of the ground, it is, by definition, an animal hole and an ACC. If the animal action has merely messed around the vegetation, then not a hole. And a scrape by the human animal in their spanking new Footjoys doesn't cut the relief mustard either, although it can be repaired on the putting green (13.1c(2)) or dealt with in very limited circumstances off the putting green (8.1d).When does a scrape become a hole?
I agree with Jim. If a 'scrape' by an animal has broken the surface of the ground, it is, by definition, an animal hole and an ACC. If the animal action has merely messed around the vegetation, then not a hole. And a scrape by the human animal in their spanking new Footjoys doesn't cut the relief mustard either, although it can be repaired on the putting green (13.1c(2)) or dealt with in very limited circumstances off the putting green (8.1d).
And don't pick and eat any blackberrys below waist level.So if you find someone has taken relief on the course you do not get free relief
Yes. Providing the area(s) are identifiable as:Not quite the same but rather than start a new thread we have several moles on our course. After a while, perhaps a month, the mole hills become well trodden and completely flat with just compacted soil. Am I correct in stating relief is still available?
Whether or not there is free relief in that situation will be a judgement call by the referee - it's not automatic after a month and several mowingsNot quite the same but rather than start a new thread we have several moles on our course. After a while, perhaps a month, the mole hills become well trodden and completely flat with just compacted soil. Am I correct in stating relief is still available?
I don't believe "well trodden and completely flat with just compacted soil" cuts it as ACC. Once that ground is back level with no surface irregularity, no loose material and no hole I can't see how it retains ACC status - it is just bare ground like any other bare ground on the course. IMO, "altered" is not intended to cover an unspecified time extension beyond when the ground has been returned to level. Of course, the Committee could mark any bare areas it wishes to provide relief from.Yes. Providing the area(s) are identifiable as:
• The loose material the animal dug out of the hole,
• Any area on the ground pushed up or altered as a result of the animal digging the hole underground.
I don't believe "well trodden and completely flat with just compacted soil" cuts it as ACC. Once that ground is back level with no surface irregularity, no loose material and no hole I can't see how it retains ACC status - it is just bare ground like any other bare ground on the course. IMO, "altered" is not intended to cover an unspecified time extension beyond when the ground has been returned to level. Of course, the Committee could mark any bare areas it wishes to provide relief from.
Whilst I am not a rules expert, I would say no - as to me, it doesn't fit the expanded description of animal hole (as given in the definitions). The pile of loose material (ie the molehill itself) is a result of the animal digging the hole underground. But the subsequent flattening/compaction is not - that is the result of other things like trampling, mowing, weather etcNot quite the same but rather than start a new thread we have several moles on our course. After a while, perhaps a month, the mole hills become well trodden and completely flat with just compacted soil. Am I correct in stating relief is still available?
Yes. Providing the area(s) are identifiable as:
• The loose material the animal dug out of the hole,
• Any area on the ground pushed up or altered as a result of the animal digging the hole underground.
When does a molehill become an ex molehill ?Glad you think so as I once refused relief from a flattened, ex-molehill.
My view is that if they have been flattened, even if not to ground level, than no relief. If the ball ends up round the circumference, between mh and normal ground, that's just tough - like ending up sitting on a divot.When does a molehill become an ex molehill ?
We have several at ours ,although they have been flattened by mowers they are still not completely level with the surrounding area.
Is there a cut off height.