HomerJSimpson
Hall of Famer
Saw this and had to admire their neck https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-essex-48649359
People seem to be writing or making observations that are clearly not factual!
Sarri wasn't or hasn't been sacked, he hasn't been hounded out either, yes some fans didn't like the football and changes he was attempting to adopt and stick with, even though it clearly at times wasn't working and was soon getting found out by the opposition, but if he felt unwanted and felt the need to leave on those grounds, then he's weak and I wouldn't want him based on that either!
However, he left because he missed being in Italy, couple that with his elderly parents who need more constant care, he wanted to be closer to home, and with sending out those signals, Juve came knocking and have given him the opportunity to leave, so everyone is happy.
It makes a refreshing change that we are getting money for a manager departing early, but then our turnover of managers works for us..
View attachment 27581
It's looking far more likely as time goes on that Lampard could be coming, I actually said when he was first mentioned it was too early for him, another year (or 2) would be better, but I've changed that view slightly, mainly because he's served under an array of managers and has seen success under most if not all of them, so his portfolio as far as gleaming all that experience must stand for something, then with a personal touch of his own knowing the club and expectations as much as he does, I think he could be very successful, and his talks with Roman to have an agreement and assurance in regards to being given time (2yrs) to be judged more evenly due to the transfer situations, and with Jody by his side and using the youth and loan players that have been shortlisted to return, I think he will/could hit the ground running!
It's very easy to find fault in any team or club, it's very easy to write doom & gloom opinions based on current situations, which I personally don't think are as bad as some people would hope or like them to be, and I think as soon as those results don't happen in the negative manner they so desire, they'll spin another yarn or drag something else up to appease there obsessions with Chelsea and how we go about our business, which again isn't that bad as the photo above of trophies & titles clearly proves.
We (Sarri) was lucky, finishing where we did was solely down to those around us choking, it wasn't by us playing any better than we had prior, we had 6th (5th at best) written all over us, but thankfully both our neighbors and Utd stuck to their usual trait of imploding, as for the Europa win, yes it's great to win and also qualify for the CL had we finished outside the top 4, but we all know cup runs and wins can be lucky also, it's all on the day, and we had ours, as we will in the future with whoever comes to lead us...
Write us off at your peril
Weak squad
You made a number of good and valid points in your post Phil, but I'd disagree with Chelsea having a 'weak' squad - everyone of our match day squad is/was an international player. The Chelsea squad last year was still better than 17 other Premier league sides - it just wasn't as good as both City and Liverpool.
Losing Hazard is absolutely massive for us, but I remember reading a fair few posts on here last season criticising Hazard's inconsistency and how he didn't show up in a number of games!
So whilst losing an 'individual' of that quality and ability is going to hurt massively, from a 'team' perspective we could be better off as we now don't have the 'give the ball to Eden and hope he comes up with a bit of magic' option, which was happening when things were getting desperate - that's easy to defend against.
But if the transfer ban remains and the new man has to go down the 'youth' route, it actually makes Chelsea a bit of an unknown quantity for next season. I seem to remember a team from Salford doing that about 20 years ago and not doing too badly with kids.........!!!
And if the team goes down the route of youth whilst you are spot in regards what Man Utd did with Butt , Scholes , Neville and Beckham but they were more a one off and a special bunch of players also mainly unknown , Chelseas youth team are scattered all over Europe , and people have seen plenty of them before to see if they are actually good enough - and whilst Hudson Odoi is clearly talented , players like Abraham ?! i dont see him being good enough.
Don't be silly, they've all been playing together at Vitesse.They also had the benefit of playing together since they were very young and that has to make a huge difference.
I should imagine that a lot of the Chelsea youngsters have barely met one another.
I should imagine that a lot of the Chelsea youngsters have barely met one another.
So all those who turn up to play week in and week out in the Academy Youth Leagues and the U23 League have barely met one another? Blimey we must be putting out a different team each week then!!!
The Youth FA Cup is for U18’s - how many of them are ready to go into the first team ?It’s amazing isn’t it, makes you wonder how we have won those leagues and FA Cups with so many strangers clocking in & out!
The Youth FA Cup is for U18’s - how many of them are ready to go into the first team ?
And the U23 only been around for 3 season - been won Everton twice and Arsenal once
Before that it was the U21 league from 2012 - Chelsea won it once
You have been successful in the FA Youth Cup and those teams will be players that can’t go on loan being under 18 - the Under 23s at the club may well be spread all over Europe hence Slimes point. Your Under 23 which is the step below the first team haven’t been that successful prob because the better players are out on loan
They'll all still know each other though Phil that's the point as they would've played in the same teams coming up through the ranks. Doesn't matter if a load of those are out on loan.
And at Chelsea - probably the same as other clubs - there are staff monitoring the players out on loan, and acting as the liaison between Chelsea and the clubs that have them with regard to their game time, development etc.
A significant number of youth players from the top clubs will go out in loan for first team experience.
I think this guy is the worst example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tomáš_KalasI think the point Slime was making is the players that Utd brought in did develop throughout as a team and then first team - there wasn’t player going on loan apart from Beckham who had 5 games - all the others - Giggs , Neville’s etc went through every level together.
Look at Abraham for example - spent about 4 years on loan now ? And there is prob a lot of players in the same situation - we have it with a couple of ours as well. But It’s going to hard for Chelsea to integrate these players into the team - if they are actually good enough though
All clubs do it - Chelsea prob a lot more than others expect maybe Arsenal but not many of those going out on loan seem to break through - we don’t have anyone really , Loftus Cheek at Chelsea was very much bit part.
It’s going to be very hard for Chelsea next season with the squad they have , injuries , transfer ban and the returning youngsters maybe not being at the required level. As you said it could be a great time for a change of direction for the club - less mass spending and more developing or getting the mix between the two , but to do that would mean patience from owner and fans , and the removal of the instant success attitude that seems to happen.
Shame they couldn't hold on with 10 men. Looked out on their feet but I guess got lucky as France missed two penalties. Bad mix up for the decider thoughExcellent goal for Foden last night.
Will we see him get more appearances at City next season? Knowing Pep it'll be at left back...