Premier League 2019-2020 we’re off

[Deleted member 16999]

The rule is a joke though.
Liverpool were defending when TAA handled it.
But the rule says in the run up to a goal .
You can’t be doing both
That’s why treating handball differently between attackers and defenders just stupid.

So if a defender deliberately handball’s in his own box and then clears it up field and an attacker runs through and scores, the goal should stand?

 

[Deleted member 1740]

Once again the worst part of all this is that people are talking about VAR rather than Fabinho’s strike or Henderson’s cross for Mane’s header.
Genuinely think this starting to look like the season they put the final nail in Football’s coffin.

Spot on.

On a separate note for the last 6 league games I've had 10er on Fabinho 1st goal, today I was in the upper anny as I took my lad. As were going up the ground I asked my lad what bet he wanted to do. ( always have a bet as abit of fun) Running late so as we flies up the stairs I headed to the betting kiosk to do 10er Fabinho 1st goal for me and ,10er mane for my boy. There was no coupons/slips left so I couldn't do the bet 🤬🤬

 

[Deleted member 16999]

Spot on.

On a separate note for the last 6 league games I've had 10er on Fabinho 1st goal, today I was in the upper anny as I took my lad. As were going up the ground I asked my lad what bet he wanted to do. ( always have a bet as abit of fun) Running late so as we flies up the stairs I headed to the betting kiosk to do 10er Fabinho 1st goal for me and ,10er mane for my boy. There was no coupons/slips left so I couldn't do the bet 🤬🤬

Not got a phone App?

 

[Deleted member 1740]

So if a defender deliberately handball’s in his own box and then clears it up field and an attacker runs through and scores, the goal should stand?

Yes, but on this occasion neither Silva nor TAA Deliberately handled it. I also thought Citys winner against spurs was harshly disallowed.

 

[Deleted member 16999]

Yes, but on this occasion neither Silva nor TAA Deliberately handled it. I also thought Citys winner against spurs was harshly disallowed.

I’m not saying they did, it was in answer to him saying you can’t do both defend and attack.
Plus Spurs got away with a few decisions last week, like you say it even’s itself out over a season.

 

[Deleted member 1740]

Not got a phone App?

Yes, many but I always like to have a bet "on course" have done since I can remember. Tradition 👍

 

[MegaSteve]

He's clearly not on the same wonder drugs you are to think we have any chance of top 4 with the lack of invention we have, the inability to defend we have, the lack of identity we have and the manager we have....

You're right on one thing that 9pts is nothing at this stage, because it will be a whole lot more between us and 4th come end of the season.

Think you maybe overlooking the possibility of Dick leaving and Freddie being the answer to our dreams...

Then again...

 

[Wolf]

Think you maybe overlooking the possibility of Dick leaving and Freddie being the answer to our dreams...

Then again...

Sadly I think the board will be flaccid and Dick will remain in charge 🙄

Can't see Freddie as the answer to our dreams either unless we're talking the Elm Street variety....

But a younger manager would be a better prospect and can think of a couple that I'd see as worth a go..

 

[Liverbirdie]

Yes why not?

Silva was ball to hand and no time to react. TTA was hand to ball with plenty of time to react.

Arguable sending off as well as it would have denied a goal scoring opportunity.

Ref bottled it and VAR never overrules the ref.

So you are that well up on the rules that you dont know that the double jeopardy rule changed a few years ago?

I think you should go and see a doctor while you still can on the NHS.

 

[Reemul]

So you are that well up on the rules that you dont know that the double jeopardy rule changed a few years ago?

I think you should go and see a doctor while you still can on the NHS.

It was clearly handball, poor decision, if it happened the other way round Liverpool fans would be fuming as well. It's just too inconsistent, not given there but given next time.

 

[Liverbirdie]

Liverpool vs City /City Vs Liverpool produce the games that sky wishes the Man U vs Liverpool games would be.They seem to have everything.

 

[Liverbirdie]

It was clearly handball, poor decision, if it happened the other way round Liverpool fans would be fuming as well. It's just too inconsistent, not given there but given next time.

I'm not arguing that.

Sawtooth said that if a pen was given TAA would also have had to be sent off - he obviously doesnt know the rules.

Are you saying that TAA's would be given 10 times out of 10? Just asking.

 

[clubchamp98]

So if a defender deliberately handball’s in his own box and then clears it up field and an attacker runs through and scores, the goal should stand?

Where did I say that?
Post 5328 is what I think.

I was saying the handball rule is a joke.
If TAA is handball then Bernardo’s is.

 

[Papas1982]

Liverpool vs City /City Vs Liverpool produce the games that sky wishes the Man U vs Liverpool games would be.They seem to have everything.

I'm not sure UTD have historically been in too many classic ding ding matches. Or at least not consistently agsint the same team. Probably due to them being so dominant for so long.

I think the period where they traded titles with arsenal there were some proper good matches, but generally it was the teams a little below which got the headlines due to teams being more evenly matched.

 

[Deleted member 16999]

Where did I say that?

“Liverpool were defending when TAA handled it.
But the rule says in the run up to a goal .
You can’t be doing both”

There

 

[clubchamp98]

“Liverpool were defending when TAA handled it.
But the rule says in the run up to a goal .
You can’t be doing both”

There

Can you be doing both.
As the handball rules are different for defenders and attackers.
What’s the cut off point 22seconds not long enough?
Where does that say the goal should stand ,I can’t see it?

 

[sawtooth]

It was clearly handball, poor decision, if it happened the other way round Liverpool fans would be fuming as well. It's just too inconsistent, not given there but given next time.

For God sake don’t have the audacity to imply that a Liverpool fan might have it wrong.

Its not a pen and that’s that.

 

[Liverbirdie]

For God sake don’t have the audacity to imply that a Liverpool fan might have it wrong.

Its not a pen and that’s that.

As much as you got it wrong with your double jeopardy bollocks, or is all of that shrouded in the mists of paranoia?

 

[Slime]

In summary;
1st goal was handball,
2nd goal was offside,
Liverpool were EASILY the better side and thoroughly deserved all three points,
VAR has taken over and is ruining the beautiful game,
Man Utd won, scored three, should have had six and moved up to 7th,
Slime did well in the European Fantasy Golf and is now going to bed.

Goodnight all.

 

[Deleted member 16999]

Can you be doing both.
As the handball rules are different for defenders and attackers.
What’s the cut off point 22seconds not long enough?
Where does that say the goal should stand ,I can’t see it?

The same player can’t but a team can.
As for the time, that’s another stupidity with VAR.