Adi2Dassler
Journeyman Pro
As I've said several times on the other thread, EFTA is where all the good guys are.
As I've said several times on the other thread, EFTA is where all the good guys are.
Hows that working out for them?
Who?The current EFTA members?Pretty good I think!
What 'trading at a deficit' means is that we spend more (in that area) than we earn. If we lose the 'free trade' advantage, then goods we sell to the EU will be more expensive, so will almost sell less, and goods that we buy from the EU will cost more.
It would be a 'lose-lose' situation - which is exactly why free trade is so important. And while it should be probably be a concern for the EU, it's not something they can really affect - except as an incentive to restore free trade. It should, however be of great concern to the UK as the overall trade deficit, both with EU and elsewhere, would almost certainly increase!
It's not about sticking two fingers up at the EU! It's about doing what is best for UK! And losing the Free Trade with EU would certainly not be best for the UK!
Your argument is based on a situation where the EU would stop any free trade agreement with us but we would allow them one.
No it's not!
That's why the cost, in UK, of EU originated items would increase!
Not if we had a Free Trade Agreement. The overall saving (without our share of the running the EU machine) would be considerable and the bigger potential free trade market could be very lucrative. Why pin our colours to one of the biggest shrinking markets.
You are going round in a circle! And moving the goalposts by raising the 'cost of running the EU machine'! That's nothing to do with 'Plan B'!
Already got a FTA, by being a member of the EU! Potential Free Trade market wouldn't change from what it is now! UK is quite capable of negotiating other FTAs already!
Cameron does not have one if the UK votes to leave the EU.
Nick Robinson asked him five times and he did/could not answer.
The savings are everything to do with 'Plan B'. ....
why would he need a plan B,his first objective is to get us a better deal to bring to the table,this will be done prior to the referendum,when all the facts will then be discussed a referendum will be done as promised,if we vote to leave we will leave and decisions will be made,what do you want him to say,we will do xyz this would stop any negotiation ongoing and the pound would plummet,investment would stop and the country would be worse off than when BROWN did the dirty.Cameron does not have one if the UK votes to leave the EU.
Nick Robinson asked him five times and he did/could not answer.
This is 'Plan B'!
You are talking about the confirmation or rejection of 'Plan A' - staying within the EU!
Nothing to do with this (Plan B) thread! If you wish to discuss/debate that, then start a 'Plan A or not!' one!
Btw. The EU is currently negotiating FTAs with India, Singapore and US.
why would he need a plan B,his first objective is to get us a better deal to bring to the table,this will be done prior to the referendum,when all the facts will then be discussed a referendum will be done as promised,if we vote to leave we will leave and decisions will be made,what do you want him to say,we will do xyz this would stop any negotiation ongoing and the pound would plummet,investment would stop and the country would be worse off than when BROWN did the dirty.
Did he not promise the UK electorate an 'In/Out' vote on Europe.
I did not see any 'devo max' type of Europe promise from the Tories. Any UK leader would naturally try to get the best deal for the UK but none of them promised an in out vote.
He must have a Plan B if the UK electorate decide that they wish to leave the EU.
Has said all along that he will try and renegotiate certain criteria for us to remain in the EU, if the public don't/do like the new conditions then they can vote accordingly. He has always been open on his desire for the UK to remain in the UK.
Trouble is that he really hasn't left much time for this.
As I thought .....No Plan B if the electorate chose to leave the EU.
yes thats one way of describing it- pretty average for some is another, pretty poor for a few is another and pretty nondescript for many is another.
apologies original poster for going off topic, just responding to a post