I think all the comments so far are within the boundaries. Fair point to raise a warning but no accusations are flying around, the discussion is reasoned.
I think Aluko is clearly looking for some sort of pay day when her international career stalled under Sampson. I guess the interesting question is what happens when the new manager comes in and she's still banging the goals in at club level. Will the new boss pick her (or will the FA "suggest" they do) and if so will she be welcomed back into the fold. I feel not as I believe the majority of the squad respected the outcome of the two reports and were enjoying the success and progress they were making under Sampson
i don't think she helped herself with the tweet after the goal the other day. She came across as very bitter
Think she is a fully qualified solicitor, who can practice in the UK and US, so think she might be alright after football.:thup:I think Aluko is clearly looking for some sort of pay day when her international career stalled under Sampson. I guess the interesting question is what happens when the new manager comes in and she's still banging the goals in at club level. Will the new boss pick her (or will the FA "suggest" they do) and if so will she be welcomed back into the fold. I feel not as I believe the majority of the squad respected the outcome of the two reports and were enjoying the success and progress they were making under Sampson
Think she is a fully qualified solicitor, who can practice in the UK and US, so think she might be alright after football.:thup:
Why would she get pay off taken away ? Did she have to quit International football to receive it ? I am confused. I would have though that after MP's have reviewed the case, and evidence from Bristol is revealed she might be due more money. It looks like the FA employed someone who if they had read his reference, would not have touched with a barge pole. To be fair the FA are a joke. Surely if you employ someone that has been sacked from previous job for non footballing reasons, it would set the alarm bells ringing. You might want to read the reasons why.I'm sure she will be but when you see your current payday suddenly taken away you see how some would want my more big pay out before getting a "proper" job. She still thinks she can score at international level and feels her career was cut short.
Why would she get pay off taken away ? Did she have to quit International football to receive it ? I am confused. I would have though that after MP's have reviewed the case, and evidence from Bristol is revealed she might be due more money. It looks like the FA employed someone who if they had read his reference, would not have touched with a barge pole. To be fair the FA are a joke. Surely if you employ someone that has been sacked from previous job for non footballing reasons, it would set the alarm bells ringing. You might want to read the reasons why.
I think there is a lot more to come out of this, so I will not speculate any further.
Where was he sacked from before?
All 'evidence' of his appointment at Bristol Accademy was investigated, twice, internally and with an external barrister and he was cleared of any wrong doings and even the FA are still stating even after reading all the reports now in full, that, he poses no risk and is clear to coach! Not that that will ever happen now with the debacle that is going on.
Where was he sacked from before?
All 'evidence' of his appointment at Bristol Accademy was investigated, twice, internally and with an external barrister and he was cleared of any wrong doings and even the FA are still stating even after reading all the reports now in full, that, he poses no risk and is clear to coach! Not that that will ever happen now with the debacle that is going on.
Apologies, he was sacked by England for allegations made when he was at Bristol. Still think FA may not come out of this well, but we will see.Where was he sacked from before?
All 'evidence' of his appointment at Bristol Accademy was investigated, twice, internally and with an external barrister and he was cleared of any wrong doings and even the FA are still stating even after reading all the reports now in full, that, he poses no risk and is clear to coach! Not that that will ever happen now with the debacle that is going on.
If he thinks he has done nothing wrong could he not go to a tribunal and sue the fa for wrongful dismissal?
so in England that's Not Guilty then!The English legal system has two verdicts; guilty or not guilty.
The Scottish legal system has three verdicts; guilty, not guilty and not proven.
The more I hear about this, the more it sounds likes a not proven.
4) The FA then revisit the 2014/15 investigation and decide he's guilty...
This isn't my understanding of it, Brian.
I'm reading it as they've gone back and read in more detail and decided that while there is no legal wrongdoing, he has acted in a way that isn't up to their standard morally.
Until we find out what he did, it's hard to know. The natural assumption is that he's had some sort of relationship with a player(s).
I should be sacked for marrying another employee!