Maltby MPF Ratings 2011

DCB

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 6, 2007
Messages
7,732
Location
Midlothian
Visit site
just been having a look through maltby's updated list and one or two surprises in there with this seasons current crop of clubs .

Here

Maybe should have gone for the Pings or the Callaways ;)
 
I always find these weird.

My old Macgregor 1025m blades are rated as game improving, with a rating of 600. I never found them to improve my game at all. Quite the opposite.

I changed to Titleist ZB, which are way easier to hit than the Macgregors. Nope, these are harder, are described as conventional, with a rating of 495.

If I changed at all, the Nike VR pro combo's look nice. Should be a bit like my ZBs, but a tad more forgiving given they have a bit more technology in the long irons. Nope, wrong again. Described as classic, with a rating of 342.

Confused.
 
I love the way MX25's and MP57's are considered conventional but the Cleveland CG7 Tour and the MP52's are classic.
And what constitutes more playable anyway?
Ping S56 more playable than TM Burner???
S57's more playable than MX-200's???
 
A few examples of irons more playable than my MX300's

Mizuno - MP30, 33, 57, and 60's
Titleist - 690MB
My old Hogan FTX's and since i know from personal experience... no chance in hell!

I think he must pop a number in his head.

Notice the stamp on the hosel...
MA0123.jpg


Those look pretty hard to hit in comparison to many way down the PF list to me!
 
I love the way MX25's and MP57's are considered conventional but the Cleveland CG7 Tour and the MP52's are classic.

Nice to know i play with classic mp52's. Would hate to be playing peasant clubs. :D
 
Top